Based on the results of the study, the conclusion which is valid is There is correlation between the increase in the rate of televised political attack ads since the previous congressional election and the rate of voter dissatisfaction in the observed districts.
<h3>What doe
s the study conclude?</h3>
The study showed that the rate of voter dissatisfaction in the districts since the previous election cycles is similar to the rate of increase of televised political attack ads.
The fact that both the rate of voter dissatisfaction and televised political attack ads moved together means that they correlate with each other.
It is important to note however, that correlation does not equate causation so there might be no link between the two rates.
Find out more on correlation at brainly.com/question/26998752
#SPJ1
<span>What changes might help "Happiness is a charming Charlie Brown at orlando rep" to take on the general purpose of "You're a good man, Charlie Brown?</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
see explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
A difference of 2 squares factors in general as
a² - b² = (a - b)(a + b)
(x - 1)² - 25 ← is a difference of squares
with a = x - 1 and b = 5, thus
(x - 1)² - 25
=(x - 1 - 5)(x - 1 + 5) = (x - 6)(x + 4), then
(x - 6)(x + 4) = 0
Equate each factor to zero and solve for x
x - 6 = 0 ⇒ x = 6
x + 4 = 0 ⇒ x = - 4
Solutions are x = - 4, x = 6
Answer:
I'm pretty sure the answer is 75%.
Step-by-step explanation:
Well, when you do 60 / 20, you get <u>3.</u>
So, then when you make 3 a percentage,
it comes out 75%.
Hope this is right...!
All you do is multiply across. For example...
1/3 x 2/5
Multiply the numerators and denominators.
(1 x 2) / (3 x 5)
= 2/15
If you need to, you can simplify but in this case you don't have to.
I hope this helps love! :)
