1. 0.7(29.95)
2. 1.04(284.99)
3. 49(0.75)(1.06)
4. 35+ 0.80m
5. 4500 (1.12)
Hope this helps!
Answer:
A: 
B: 
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>A:</u>
Our expression is 
. We need to find some common factors. Clearly, we can see that both terms share the x² part, so we can definitely take that out:
Let's see if 96 is divisible by 6:
96 ÷ 6 = 16; since there's no remainder / the remainder is 0, we know 96 is divisible by 6, so we can also factor out 6:
Thus, the answer to part A is .
<u>B:</u>
Look at the 
part of the above factored expression. Notice that it is a difference of squares (because 
and 16 = 4²), so we can write this as:
Now take a look at the 
part. Again, it's a difference of squares because 
and 4 = 2², so rewrite that as:
Put it all together:
Thus, the answer to part B is .
Yes, in my opinion I think a bar model would be a good model for converting miles to feet. It is simple and easy to understand
If x were positive, y would have to be a larger negative number.
Suppose x = 10. y would have to be negative 11+.
In other words, the absolute value of y would have to be greater than the value of x
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
since p is an odd number choice C can't be the answer because 4 is even number
Q is an even number so that choice B can't be answers because 3 is an odd number .
and for A 6 isnot a prime number so that it proves tim is correct.
but when we see D 2 is a prime number so that it shows tim is wrong.
