Answer:She placed the decimal point incorrectly when dividing. i took the test
X= 130°
Step-by-step explanation:
From E, draw EF || AB || CD.
Now, EF || CD and CE is the transversal.
So; <DCE + <CEF = 180° [co. int. <s]
x° + <CEF = 180°
<CEF = (180° – x°).
Again, EF || AB and AE is the transversal.
So; <BAE + <AEF = 180° 01 [co. int. <s ]
105° + <AEC+ <CEF = 180°
105° +25° + (180° – x°) = 180°
x° = 130°
I hope I helped you^_^
Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)
We can solve with a system of equations, and use c for the amount of cans of soup and f for the amount of frozen dinners.
The first equation will represent the amount of sodium. We know the (sodium in one can times the number of cans) plus (sodium in one frozen dinner times the number of dinners) is the expression for the total sodium. We also know the total sodium is 4450, so:
250c + 550f = 4450
The second equation is to find how many of each item are purchased:
c + f = 13
Solve for c in the second equation:
c = 13 - f
Plug this in for c in the first equation:
250(13-f) + 550f = 4450
3250 - 250f + 550f = 4450
300f = 1200
f = 4
Now plug the value for f into the second equation:
c + 4 = 13
c = 9
The answer is 9 cans of soups and 4 frozen dinners.
By doing by over 2 it will equal yeah
