3 years ago

(a) Briefly explain ONE major difference between Wilentz's and Hahn's

1 answer:

Rudiy273 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Wilentz considers that Manifest Destiny was democratic in certain moments. While Hahn believes that Manifest Destiny had imperialist concepts of control.

Explanation:

Wilentz considers that the Manifest Destiny had a democratic nature, most of the time, since the Ameiran empire considered implementing its concepts in the regions it dominated, so, since the USA was democratic, so was the Manifest Destiny presented an ambivalent nature, where democracy was sometimes not respected.

Hahn, on the other hand, believed that Manifest Destiny was imperialistic in nature and arose out of a desire to provoke in other regions, which the English colonists did in America.

You might be interested in

This process involves changing the way you think about the situation that gave rise to a negative emotion:

Marysya12 [62]

I think its emotional reappraisal

7 0

3 years ago

What event happened during president ulysses s grant's presidency

Vanyuwa [196]

Answer:

<u>American Civil War</u>

In 1865, as commanding general, Ulysses S. Grant led the Union Armies to victory over the Confederacy in the American Civil War. As an American hero, Grant was later elected the 18th President of the United States (1869–1877), working to implement Congressional Reconstruction and to remove the vestiges of slavery.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did the actions of Spain and Portugal help to create a global<br> economy?

Butoxors [25]

Answer:

Explanation:

trust me bro

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In what year did the area that is now California become part of the United States?