Answer:
Wilentz considers that Manifest Destiny was democratic in certain moments. While Hahn believes that Manifest Destiny had imperialist concepts of control.
Explanation:
Wilentz considers that the Manifest Destiny had a democratic nature, most of the time, since the Ameiran empire considered implementing its concepts in the regions it dominated, so, since the USA was democratic, so was the Manifest Destiny presented an ambivalent nature, where democracy was sometimes not respected.
Hahn, on the other hand, believed that Manifest Destiny was imperialistic in nature and arose out of a desire to provoke in other regions, which the English colonists did in America.
