1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
solmaris [256]
3 years ago
12

(a) Briefly explain ONE major difference between Wilentz's and Hahn's

History
1 answer:
Rudiy273 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Wilentz considers that Manifest Destiny was democratic in certain moments. While Hahn believes that Manifest Destiny had imperialist concepts of control.

Explanation:

Wilentz considers that the Manifest Destiny had a democratic nature, most of the time, since the Ameiran empire considered implementing its concepts in the regions it dominated, so, since the USA was democratic, so was the Manifest Destiny presented an ambivalent nature, where democracy was sometimes not respected.

Hahn, on the other hand, believed that Manifest Destiny was imperialistic in nature and arose out of a desire to provoke in other regions, which the English colonists did in America.

You might be interested in
Which of the following statements are correct?
antoniya [11.8K]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Mexican American war started because:
Rasek [7]

Answer: c

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List one way Truman Stalin’s approaches to maintaining peace were similar
8090 [49]
During the cold war, both leaders refrained from any physical or official acts of warfare. It mostly consisted of them taking control of foreign nations that were battling each other, but neither the US or Soviet Union declared war on one another. This was because it happened so soon after WWII that neither wanted to be held responsibly for another war.
8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements is FALSE?
marta [7]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Jim Crow Laws were segregating against african americans.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why should historians watch out for personal biases
aniked [119]
Because so they can avoid opinions and get the facts. Also because depending on the origin of the historian, he may have a prerequisite <span>feelings towards a culture or a nation.</span>
6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following explains the significance of the Analects of Confucius?
    12·2 answers
  • What is the first step in simplifying 3 – b(7b + 2) + 3b – (11 – b)?
    13·2 answers
  • Did the Magna Carta influence the American colonists’ ideas about government?
    8·2 answers
  • What metaphor did people use when referring to more territory joining the United States?
    8·1 answer
  • How did Spain try to establish its empire in the Americas?
    15·2 answers
  • What is another name for the principle of limited government
    13·1 answer
  • Dorothy was cheated by a company on the pretext that she was making an investment. She plans to file a case against the company,
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an example of a powerful action taken by the United Nations
    12·2 answers
  • Which situation caused the Great Depression to get even worse following the
    14·2 answers
  • Mark each statement if it describes how the nation reacted to the fear of communism in the 1950s. Select the three correct answe
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!