Answer:
1. Please find it attached.
If both of them don't get lawyers they will each make half of the $5 million being $2.5 million a piece.
If one side hires a lawyer and the other doesn't, the side with the lawyer will win 0.9 of $5 million which is $4,500,000. However they would have paid the lawyer $200,000 so that payout drops to $4,500,000. The other would make 0.1 which is $500,000.
If they both get a lawyer they will each get half which is $2,500,000 but they would both have paid their lawyers $200,000 a piece so the net payout would be $2,300,000.
2. The Nash Equilibrium is the alternative that it would not serve either party to deviate from as it serves them both well. The Nash Equilibriums would be If both don't get a lawyer or if both get a lawyer.
3. Yes they would because without lawyers they would make more money as they would not have to pay the $200,000 in fees.
Increasing at the moment. After a few weeks, when the price becomes unreasonable, I doubt Marvin would want to buy chocolate truffles.
I hope you found this helpful! :)
<h2>Establish a business environment that promotes and rewards is the choice which the Prime Minister likely to choose.</h2>
Explanation:
The motto here is to increase the wealth of the country.
Option 1: Invading other countries is unethical and also, it cannot assure that, Cantlivia will improve. The reason is the country which the option says is poorer than Cantlivia, so point of growth could be seen.
Option 2: Already the country economy is down, so purchasing new tools is not possible hence this option is invalid.
Option 3: We can increase wealth only by creating business and creating entrepreneurs. So this is the right choice.
Option 4: Creating a barrier will actually slow down wealth. So this option is not right.