Answer:
1) The benefit should be possible to measure in terms of money.
2) arguments 2 and 3 from the councelor can be considered benefits.
Explanation:
The benefit should be possible to measure in terms of money.
Like revenue, cash flow, job creation, reduce of cost, elimination of cost, increase in productivity per factor and so on.
The acceptance of the view for the bike riders is not measurable in terms of money. We cannot determinate the additional utility in cash for a better view
While we can determinate the lower cost in terms of CO2 emmisions (which have a cost) the time-savings for the people can also be estimated. This will reduce the time on highway for people going to work, and time is money. This increase productivity. Public transport can potentially decrease their times if less automobiles are in the streets.
The construction-related job are also a benefit as will increase the GDP.
Answer:
a large percentage of the total cost
Explanation:
When a product has a high value to weight ratio it means it is expensive and the weight is light. For products with low value to cash ratio they are cheap but have large weight.
Low value to weight ratio goods are more expensive to transport and they do not make up the high transportation cost because they are also cheap.
In this scenario Sweet Stuff Sugar Source ships low value to weight goods all over the world. So their transportation cost will be high and it will make up a large percentage of total cost.
Quality. The answer is quality
Most likely, it will be India. Please mark Brainliest!!!
Answer:
GDP is likely to remain same as a result of this conversion.
Explanation:
GDP is the total value of goods & services, produced by an economy, during a given year.
It can be calculated by 2 methods
- By Expenditure method : GDP = Private Final Capital Expenditure + Govt. Final Consumption Expenditure + Gross Domestic Capital Formation + Net Exports
- By Income method : NDP = Compensation of Employees + Operating Surplus (Rent + Profit + Income) + Mixed Income
Given case - Converting a rented apartment into a resident owned condominium , with value of housing services = rent formerly paid :
This brings no change in the GDP, as : The apartment 'rent' previously paid was included in 'operating surplus' of national income, by Income method. And, the equal condominium value is now included in investment addition i.e 'Gross domestic capital formation' , by Income method.
