All categories

3 years ago

Round 176,257 to the nearest hundred thousand

Mathematics

1 answer:

Luden [163]3 years ago

6 0

The nearest hundred thousand would give you zeros after the comma in 176,257

If the number to the right of the comma in this case the "2" is 4 or less than you don't round the 6 up. If the "2" is 5 or greater than you round the 6 up by one number.

For example : 123,557 gives us 124,000

but 123,337 gives us 123,000

Therefore our answer is 176,000

You might be interested in

Solve for X. y 45° 10 X In geometry

swat32

Step-by-step explanation:

I don't recognize this problem, please make sure the input is complete.

6 0

2 years ago

Explain how you got the answer please

Alisiya [41]

The answer is C.
You want:

10 < a < 14 (greater or equal)
The difference between 10 and 12 is 2.
The difference between 12 and 14 is 2.
Therefore the absolute value allows you to express that the difference between a and 12 cannot be greater than 2 (either going up to a max of 14 or going down to a minimum of 10).

5 0

3 years ago

Antoinette solves the linear equation 3(x-3)+2x+9=2x+2(x-1)

xeze [42]

Hope this worked :3

8 0

3 years ago

I need help with these

Ksenya-84 [330]

Answer:

2. 20 oranges

3. 18 yellow tulips

4. 23 students

4 0

3 years ago

Using traditional methods, it takes 95 hours to receive a basic flying license. A new license training method using Computer Aid

Snowcat [4.5K]

Answer:

There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the technique performs differently than the traditional method.

Step-by-step explanation:

The null hypothesis is:

$H_{0} = 95$

The alternate hypotesis is:

$H_{1} \neq 95$

The test statistic is:

$z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}$

In which X is the sample mean, $\mu$ is the value tested at the null hypothesis, $\sigma$ is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

A researcher used the technique with 260 students and observed that they had a mean of 94 hours. Assume the standard deviation is known to be 6.

This means, respectively, that $n = 260, X = 94, \sigma = 6$

The test-statistic is:

$z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}$

$z = \frac{94 - 95}{\frac{6}{\sqrt{260}}}$

$z = -2.69$

The pvalue is:

2(P(Z < -2.69))

P(Z < -2.69) is the pvalue of Z when X = -2.69, which looking at the z-table, is 0.0036

2*(0.0036) = 0.0072

0.0072 < 0.01, which means that the null hypothesis is accepted, that is, there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the technique performs differently than the traditional method.

7 0

2 years ago