Eric was trying to sleep one night but there was too much noise

Twenty two more than four times a number is less than 82

elena55 [62]

22+4*n-82 hope this is what u are looking for

7 0

3 years ago

The graph of a polynomial is shown below. Between which two x-values does this polynomial have an extreme value?

stiv31 [10]

Answer:

C.-3 to -2

Step-by-step explanation:

From the picture attached, it can be seen that an extreme value, that is, a maximum of the polynomial is found between x = -3 and x = -2. In this extreme point, the polynomial has an approximate value of 4.5

7 0

3 years ago

A seamstress is paid $9.55 for every pair of pants made. how many pants would have to be made to receive $525.00 a week?

Svetlanka [38]

Let the number of pants have to be made be x.

So,

9.55 * x = 525.00

x = $\frac{525}{9.55}$ ≈ 54.97

Thus, the number of pants have to be made are 54.

8 0

3 years ago

4. What is the value of the underlined digit?

Arisa [49]

Answer:

hundreth, because it is the second digit after the decimal point.

3 0

3 years ago

The USDA conducted tests for salmonella in produce grown in California. In an independent sample of 252 cultures obtained from w

Marat540 [252]

Answer:

The decision rule is

Fail to reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is

There no sufficient evidence to show that the proportion of salmonella in the region’s water differs from the proportion of salmonella in the region’s wildlife

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The first sample size is $n_1 = 252$

The number that tested positive is $k_1 = 18$

The second sample size is $n_2 = 476$

The number that tested positive is $k_2 = 20$

The level of significance is $\alpha = 0.01$

Generally the first sample proportion is mathematically represented as

$\^ p _1 = \frac{k_1 }{ n_1 }$

=> $\^ p _1 = \frac{18 }{ 252 }$

=> $\^ p _1 = 0.071$

Generally the second sample proportion is mathematically represented as

$\^ p _2 = \frac{k_2 }{ n_2 }$

=> $\^ p _2 = \frac{20 }{ 476}$

=> $\^ p _2 = 0.042$

The null hypothesis is $H_o : p_1 - p_2 = 0$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a : p_1 - p_2 \ne 0$

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented

$z = \frac{ \^ p_1 - \^ p_2 - ( p_ 1 - p_2 )}{ \sqrt{\frac{\^ p_1 (1-\^ p_1)}{ n_1 } + \frac{\^ p_2 (1-\^ p_2)}{ n_2 } } }$

=> $z = \frac{ 0.071 - 0.042 - 0 }{ \sqrt{\frac{0.071 (1-0.071)}{ 252 } + \frac{0.042 (1-\^ 0.042)}{ 476 } } }$

=> $z = 1.56$

From the z table the area under the normal curve to the right corresponding to 1.56 is

$P(Z > 1.56 ) =0.05938$

Generally the p-value is mathematically represented as

$p-value = 2 * P(Z > 1.56 )$

=> $p-value = 2 * 0.05938$

=> $p-value = 0.1188$

From the value obtained we see that $p-value > \alpha$ hence

The decision rule is

Fail to reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is

There no sufficient evidence to show that the proportion of salmonella in the region’s water differs from the proportion of salmonella in the region’s wildlife

5 0

2 years ago