Answer: False
Explanation: Everyone thinks differently, example: Karen walks into a hospital one day because her precious angel stepped on a rusty nail, she asks a doctor what they can do and the doctor says that they will clean his foot out and give the child a tetanus vaccine. The mother flips out and says that the vaccine is too foreign for her precious angel's body and will get autism. She leaves with her child in her grasp. 5 days later, the child dies from extreme lock jaw. I hope this represents that people do make uneducated opinions.
Grizzly bears live in Forrest's they will eat just about anything. They will most likely live in a cave or den.
Answer:
what is their convorsation
Explanation:
Explanation:
An increase in the number of social grants to teenage mothers is likely to have negative consequences as listed:
i) Grants make people lazy and dependent on the government
The teen mothers will not be motivated to become self-reliant by looking for work. Instead they rely on the government grants to acquire capital which they use for their needs.
ii) The child grant increases teenage pregnancy.
This is where teen mothers may become pregnant intentionally to access the grants.
iii) Recipients misuse grant money.
The teen mothers may use the grants to buy drugs and abusing of alcohol. The monies are primarily used for food and some basic non-food items such as school fees and uniforms, health and transport.
iv) Social Life
When the number of social grants to teen mothers are increased, their social lives are impacted negatively. These teen mothers see themselves as pariahs and burdens to the society. They are likely to withdraw from social life due to the shame and low self-esteem they often experience.
v) Financial Life
Due to the fact that these teen mothers often do not have stable jobs, their financial lives are uncertain. They depend on the social grants for their upkeep. If these grants are increased many teen mothers do not perceive the value of looking for employment.
vi) Education
Since most of the teen mothers drop out of school after they become pregnant, their education ceases. Increasing the number of social grants discourages them from completing their studies. They reason that since they are getting 'free money' there is no need for further education.
I believe the lather that there should be gun restriction because modern weapons have become 100 times more accessible today than in the past. It is fundamental to understand that guns are not the problem itself but the power lies in the individual who can use that gun for dangerous, threatening reasons. So Yes gun restriction is necessary because every person isn't capable of using a gun properly.
please vote my answer brainliest. thanks!
