A sociologist polled a random sample of people and asked them their age and annual income. The two-way frequency table below sho
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Check the picture below.
with negative angles, we go "clockwise", the same direction a clock hands move.
so -360-360-125 = -845.
so as you see in the picture, you go around twice, and then a little bit more, an extra 125°, landing you at -125°, or its positive counterpart, 235°.
with negative angles, we go "clockwise", the same direction a clock hands move.
so -360-360-125 = -845.
so as you see in the picture, you go around twice, and then a little bit more, an extra 125°, landing you at -125°, or its positive counterpart, 235°.
well, in the election, the losing candidate received 10200 votes, and we know that's 30% of the whole votes cast, le's say the whole amount is "x" or namely 100%.
B)
A)
Dorian's 3060 is really 30% of 10200, however, the losing candidate received 30% of the total votes cast, and that is 10200, so Dorian mistakenly is using 30% of the 30% received by the losing candidate as point of reference for her total.