Sedatives and Hypnotics depress the central nervous system by interfering with the transmission of nerve impulses.
Like alcohol, sedatives and hypnotics are depressants that depress the central nervous system. Since long-term exposure to alcohol can lead to the development of depression, chronic use of sedatives and hypnotics, as demonstrated by several neurobiological and imaging studies
Long-term use of sedatives can cause side effects such as Psychiatric disorders such as anxiety.
It has been suggested that treating depression and anxiety with sedatives/hypnotics, especially benzodiazepines, may reduce the risk in the first few weeks. Sedatives/hypnotics also have inhibitory and disinhibitory properties, but these may increase the risk
Learn more about central nervous system here: brainly.com/question/26348097
#SPJ4
The answer is three types
The factors with the most improvement as shown on the test were:
- Having a professional job
- more education
- people who do not to drugs
<h3>What is an intelligence test?</h3>
This is a test that is carried out on human beings in order to determine their intelligence quotients.
These tests are carried out on people to get where they fall in terms of their ability to reason and carry out tasks.
Read more on intelligence here: brainly.com/question/14012987
Answer:
The three components of an attitude are cognitive, affective, and behavioral. The cognitive component of an attitude is the knowledge or beliefs concerning the attitudinal object. The affective component of an attitude is the emotional stance toward the object. The behavioral aspect of an attitude includes both the behaviors that are inspired by the attitude and the intended behavior inspired by the attitude.
Explanation:
Answer:
The implications of Radical Skepticism for knowledge and for the rest of life is described below in details.
Explanation:
Radical skepticism is the thoughtful condition that experience is most likely unattainable. Radical skeptics believe that uncertainty endures as to the truthfulness of every faith and that assurance is therefore never explained. The cause for this is that accurately represented, radical skepticism is expected to be nonsense, in that it presents deep anxiety in our epistemological theories.
