All categories

2 years ago

How is locating -1.5 on a number line the same as locating 1.5 on a number line How is it different?

1 answer:

5 0

Locating -1.5 on a number line is the same as locating 1.5 because both numbers are the same distance from zero, but in opposite directions. The numbers also have the same absolute value.

Locating -1.5 and 1.5 is different because -1.5 can be found to the left of zero (because it is a negative number) while 1.5 is found to the right of zero (because it’s a positive number).

You might be interested in

A measure of______ for a numerical data set summarizes all of its values with a single number? A) symmetry B)shape C) deviation

rusak2 [61]

Answer:

D) center

Step-by-step explanation:

i am taking the test rn and i got it correct just now

-chilly

8 0

3 years ago

) The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration collects data on seat-belt use and publishes results in the document Occupa

asambeis [7]

Answer:

We conclude that there is a difference in seat belt use.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that of 1,000 drivers 16-24 years old, 79% said they buckle up, whereas 924 of 1,100 drivers 25-69 years old said they did.

Let $p_1$ = population proportion of drivers 16-24 years old who buckle up .

$p_2$ = population proportion of drivers 25-69 years old who buckle up .

So, Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $p_1-p_2$ = 0 {means that there is no significant difference in seat belt use}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $p_1-p_2\neq$ 0 {means that there is a difference in seat belt use}

The test statistics that would be used here Two-sample z proportion statistics;

T.S. = $\frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} } }$ ~ N(0,1)

where, $\hat p_1$ = sample proportion of drivers 16-24 years old who buckle up = 79%

$\hat p_2$ = sample proportion of drivers 25-69 years old who buckle up = $\frac{924}{1100}$ = 84%

$n_1$ = sample of 16-24 years old drivers = 1000

$n_2$ = sample of 25-69 years old drivers = 1100

So, test statistics = $\frac{(0.79-0.84)-(0)}{\sqrt{\frac{0.79(1-0.79)}{1000}+\frac{0.84(1-0.84)}{1100} } }$

= -2.946

The value of z test statistics is -2.946.

Since, in the question we are not given with the level of significance so we assume it to be 5%. Now, at 0.05 significance level the z table gives critical values of -1.96 and 1.96 for two-tailed test.

Since our test statistics doesn't lie within the range of critical values of z, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that there is a difference in seat belt use.

4 0

3 years ago

4 of 7 June rolls a fair dice 234 times. How many times would June expect to roll a one?

alexandr402 [8]

Answer: 39 times

Step-by-step explanation: A fair dice has 6 sides with each side having a different number between 1 and 6. Therefore, the probability of rolling a 1 is 1/6. To find out how many times June would expect to roll a 1 after rolling the dice 234 times, you must multiply 234 by 1/6 to get the answer of 39.

7 0

2 years ago

Do you get your back from the question is your a question is removed

qwelly [4]

Yes it does because question back no remove

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

algol [13]

Answer:

$\boxed{\sf{4}}}$

Step-by-step explanation:

Use a slope form.

Slope:

$\sf{\dfrac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}=\dfrac{rise}{run} }$

y₂ = (17)

y₁ = (1)

x₂ = (2)

x₁ = (-2)

Then, rewrite the problem.

Solve.

$\sf{\dfrac{17-1}{2-(-2)}=\dfrac{16}{4}=\dfrac{16\div4}{4\div4}=\dfrac{4}{1}=\boxed{\sf{4} }$

Therefore, the slope is 4, which is our answer.

I hope this helps you! Let me know if my answer is wrong or not.

5 0

2 years ago

How is locating -1.5 on a number line the same as locating 1.5 on a number line How is it different?​

How is locating -1.5 on a number line the same as locating 1.5 on a number line How is it different?