The answer to this question would be: too low
Molar mass would be determined by the number of mol and the mass of the object. Mass wouldn't be influenced by the temperature, but number of mol is. Using ideal gas formula of PV=nRT you can conlude that the amount of mol(n) is inversely related to the temperature (T).
If the temperature is higher than it supposed to be, then the amount of mol would be lower than it supposed to be.
Answer:
A) remove germs from the blood
Explanation:
cause the rest are the skeletal system function
<u>Answer:</u> The pH change of the buffer is 0.30
<u>Explanation:</u>
To calculate the pH of basic buffer, we use the equation given by Henderson Hasselbalch:
![pOH=pK_b+\log(\frac{[\text{conjugate acid}]}{[\text{base}]})](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=pOH%3DpK_b%2B%5Clog%28%5Cfrac%7B%5B%5Ctext%7Bconjugate%20acid%7D%5D%7D%7B%5B%5Ctext%7Bbase%7D%5D%7D%29)
.....(1)
We are given:
= negative logarithm of base dissociation constant of aniline = 9.13
![[C_6H_5NH_3^+]=0.306M](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BC_6H_5NH_3%5E%2B%5D%3D0.306M)
![[C_6H_5NH_2]=0.418M](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BC_6H_5NH_2%5D%3D0.418M)
pOH = ?
Putting values in equation 1, we get:

To calculate pH of the solution, we use the equation:

To calculate the molarity, we use the equation:

Moles hydrochloric acid solution = 0.124 mol
Volume of solution = 1 L
Putting values in above equation, we get:

The chemical reaction for aniline and HCl follows the equation:

<u>Initial:</u> 0.418 0.124 0.306
<u>Final:</u> 0.294 - 0.430
Calculating the pOH by using using equation 1:
= negative logarithm of base dissociation constant of aniline = 9.13
![[C_6H_5NH_3^+]=0.430M](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BC_6H_5NH_3%5E%2B%5D%3D0.430M)
![[C_6H_5NH_2]=0.294M](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BC_6H_5NH_2%5D%3D0.294M)
pOH = ?
Putting values in equation 1, we get:

To calculate pH of the solution, we use the equation:

Calculating the pH change of the solution:

Hence, the pH change of the buffer is 0.30
Answer:
ΔH = -20kJ
Explanation:
The enthalpy of formation of a compound is defined as the change of enthalpy during the formation of 1 mole of the substance from its constituent elements. For H₂S(g) the reaction that describes this process is:
H₂(g) + S(g) → H₂S(g)
Using Hess's law, it is possible to sum the enthalpies of several reactions to obtain the change in enthalpy of a particular reaction thus:
<em>(1) </em>H₂S(g) + ³/₂O₂(g) → SO₂(g) + H₂O(g) ΔH = -519 kJ
<em>(2) </em>H₂(g) + ¹/₂O₂(g) → H₂O(g) ΔH = -242 kJ
<em>(3) </em>S(g) + O₂(g) → SO₂(g) ΔH = -297 kJ
The sum of -(1) + (2) + (3) gives:
<em>-(1) </em>SO₂(g) + H₂O(g) → H₂S(g) + ³/₂O₂(g) ΔH = +519 kJ
<em>(2) </em>H₂(g) + ¹/₂O₂(g) → H₂O(g) ΔH = -242 kJ
<em>(3) </em>S(g) + O₂(g) → SO₂(g) ΔH = -297 kJ
<em>-(1) + (2) + (3): </em><em>H₂(g) + S(g) → H₂S(g) </em>
<em>ΔH =</em> +519kJ - 242kJ - 297kJ = <em>-20 kJ</em>
<em />
I hope it helps!
1. The reactivity among the alkali metals increases as you go down the group due to the decrease in the effective nuclear charge from the increased shielding by the greater number of electrons. The greater the atomic number, the weaker the hold on the valence electron the nucleus has, and the more easily the element can lose the electron. Conversely, the lower the atomic number, the greater pull the nucleus has on the valence electron, and the less readily would the element be able to lose the electron (relatively speaking). Thus, in the first set comprising group I elements, sodium (Na) would be the least likely to lose its valence electron (and, for that matter, its core electrons).
2. The elements in this set are the group II alkaline earth metals, and they follow the same trend as the alkali metals. Of the elements here, beryllium (Be) would have the highest effective nuclear charge, and so it would be the least likely to lose its valence electrons. In fact, beryllium has a tendency not to lose (or gain) electrons, i.e., ionize, at all; it is unique among its congeners in that it tends to form covalent bonds.
3. While the alkali and alkaline earth metals would lose electrons to attain a noble gas configuration, the group VIIA halogens, as we have here, would need to gain a valence electron for an full octet. The trends in the group I and II elements are turned on their head for the halogens: The smaller the atomic number, the less shielding, and so the greater the pull by the nucleus to gain a valence electron. And as the atomic number increases (such as when you go down the group), the more shielding there is, the weaker the effective nuclear charge, and the lesser the tendency to gain a valence electron. Bromine (Br) has the largest atomic number among the halogens in this set, so an electron would feel the smallest pull from a bromine atom; bromine would thus be the least likely here to gain a valence electron.
4. The pattern for the elements in this set (the group VI chalcogens) generally follows that of the halogens. The greater the atomic number, the weaker the pull of the nucleus, and so the lesser the tendency to gain electrons. Tellurium (Te) has the highest atomic number among the elements in the set, and so it would be the least likely to gain electrons.