Can one of y’all help me with this pls

Zolol [24]

Dab on them haters brobro

6 0

2 years ago

A university wants to compare out-of-state applicants' mean SAT math scores (?1) to in-state applicants' mean SAT math scores (?

nordsb [41]

Answer:

d. Yes, because the confidence interval does not contain zero.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that the university looks at 35 in-state applicants and 35 out-of-state applicants. The mean SAT math score for in-state applicants was 540, with a standard deviation of 20.

The mean SAT math score for out-of-state applicants was 555, with a standard deviation of 25.

Firstly, the Pivotal quantity for 95% confidence interval for the difference between the population means is given by;

P.Q. = $\frac{(\bar X_1-\bar X_2)-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{s_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} } }$ ~ $t__n__1-_n__2-2$

where, $\bar X_1$ = sample mean SAT math score for in-state applicants = 540

$\bar X_2$ = sample mean SAT math score for out-of-state applicants = 555

$s_1$ = sample standard deviation for in-state applicants = 20

$s_2$ = sample standard deviation for out-of-state applicants = 25

$n_1$ = sample of in-state applicants = 35

$n_2$ = sample of out-of-state applicants = 35

Also, $s_p=\sqrt{\frac{(n_1-1)s_1^{2} +(n_2-1)s_2^{2} }{n_1+n_2-2} }$ = $\sqrt{\frac{(35-1)\times 20^{2} +(35-1)\times 25^{2} }{35+35-2} }$ = 22.64

<em>Here for constructing 95% confidence interval we have used Two-sample t test statistics.</em>

So, 95% confidence interval for the difference between population means ( $\mu_1-\mu_2$ ) is ;

P(-1.997 < $t_6_8$ < 1.997) = 0.95 {As the critical value of t at 68 degree

of freedom are -1.997 & 1.997 with P = 2.5%}

P(-1.997 < $\frac{(\bar X_1-\bar X_2)-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{s_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} } }$ < 1.997) = 0.95

P( $-1.997 \times {s_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} } }$ < ${(\bar X_1-\bar X_2)-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}$ < $1.997 \times {s_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} } }$ ) = 0.95

P( $(\bar X_1-\bar X_2)-1.997 \times {s_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} } }$ < ( $\mu_1-\mu_2$ ) < $(\bar X_1-\bar X_2)+1.997 \times {s_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} } }$ ) = 0.95

<u>95% confidence interval for</u> ( $\mu_1-\mu_2$ ) =

[ $(\bar X_1-\bar X_2)-1.997 \times {s_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} } }$ , $(\bar X_1-\bar X_2)+1.997 \times {s_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} } }$ ]

=[ $(540-555)-1.997 \times {22.64 \times \sqrt{\frac{1}{35} +\frac{1}{35} } }$ , $(540-555)+1.997 \times {22.64 \times \sqrt{\frac{1}{35} +\frac{1}{35} } }$ ]

= [-25.81 , -4.19]

Therefore, 95% confidence interval for the difference between population means SAT math score for in-state and out-of-state applicants is [-25.81 , -4.19].

This means that the mean SAT math scores for in-state students and out-of-state students differ because the confidence interval does not contain zero.

So, option d is correct as Yes, because the confidence interval does not contain zero.

6 0

2 years ago

ACE248 your the best!!!!!

dedylja [7]

Answer:

Its D. d

Step-by-step explanation:

I believe someone else said this same thing but I'll explain it a bit differently and more in-depth.

There is this common formula that's used a lot, it's r*t=d, rate * time = distance. In this formula, we see that distance is represented as d, so we can assume that in this scenario, the distance will also be represented by d.

When doing math, you're going to wanna make the variables simple and understandable, say you're doing a coin problem with nickels and dimes, you're going to wanna label your variables for nickels "n" and your variables for dimes "d" just so you don't get confused.

Now if you have another problem like this, you don't even have to ask brainly, you can just make an educated guess like this.

5 0

2 years ago

Write any algebraic expression with at least two operations and the word phrase it represents.

alina1380 [7]

Algebraic Expression: 5x + 3y ÷ 2 = z

Word Phrase: 5 times x plus 3 times y divided by 2 equals z
______________________________________________________________
I am 99.9% sure that this is correct, if not, I am truly sorry, and please forgive me. Thank You!

7 0

2 years ago

first 33.25 was divided by some number. the resulting quotient was then multiplied by 7. following this 5.9 was subtracted

dimaraw [331]

(33.25/x)*7-5.9. ....

6 0

2 years ago