The purchase of a new vehicle or the reduction of student loan debt are examples of short-term objectives, while retirement planning, college funding, and the purchase of a second house are examples of long-term ambitions. This is further explained below.
<h3>What are short-term savings goals?</h3>
Generally, Savings objectives, such as an emergency fund or a new smartphone, that can be accomplished in less than two years are considered short-term.
In conclusion, Examples of short-term goals include the acquisition of a new car or the reduction of outstanding debt from student loans. Long-term goals include retirement preparation, the financing of further education, and the purchase of a second home.
Read more about short-term savings goals
brainly.com/question/11508361
#SPJ1
Answer:
Assuming the given question is True or False, the answer to the question is TRUE.
Explanation:
Kanban means "cards" in Japanese language. Literally it means visual signs. Car manufacturing company , Toyota coined this term.
The work item is visually represented by the Kanban card in the shop floor. The Kanban card contains the important information about the work item and the status of the work. It provides transparency in the work flow and ensures smooth working process.
Production kanban card signifies that a specific part mentioned need to be produced. If there is no kanban attached to any item then that process remains idle and is not produced.
Thus the answer is TRUE.
It’s important to know how things worked before, so then if we know how they work, we could change it or leave it the way it is. Sometimes what worked back then doesn’t work now.
Answer:
Popular Will is a political party in Venezuela founded by former Mayor of Chacao, Leopoldo López, who is its national co-ordinator. The party describes itself as progressive and social-democratic and was admitted into the Socialist International in December 2014.
Explanation:
Answer:
You should think about fair competition.
Explanation:
The ethics question here would be: Is the contribution I'm willing to pay to get the contract a bribery? So, if there are better firms than mine but they don't have the money to pay the contribution, does it mean I get preferential treatment because I can afford it? Wouldn't it be considered unfair by many?
This a common practice in business and although seen morally wrong by many, it is the only way to ensure some contracts are signed. People who advocate this way of dealing with allocating contracts say that it is a fair way, everybody has the opportunity in life to make money and some people would always make more than others. Critics say that it's unfair, especially for smaller firms and developing companies, as their chances to win big contracts are being reduced drastically.
