Answer:
hdhdujejeuhedudhdgdgdf egg ejeh
4 because 2 shoes for each stock pair and 4 × 2 = 8
The functional equation of the line is f (x)=a*x+b
you have already a: -4 -->f (x)=-4 x+b
Now you can use the point (3;-3)
3 is the x-coordinate and -3 the f (x)-coordinate
--> -3 = -4*(3) + b Now you can solve it
-3 = -12+b (+12)
b = 9
ANSWER: f (x) = -4x + 9
Answer:
The answer is "They are similar".
Step-by-step explanation:
They were comparable in this respect because both aspect ratios of the top triangle are one square more. The top triangle is equal to the base triangles if you remove one square away from the height and width.
Otherwise, we can say that it forms all different. The dilation factor which translates that bottom left point of shape I to form II is 2. But this does not map the other shape I vertices onto form II. There's, therefore, no dilation in form I of maps on form II.
Answer:
33 1/3 L of the 40% solution, 16 2/3 L of the 25% solution
Step-by-step explanation:
Set up two equations...
Let x represent the number of Liters of the 40% solution
Let y represent the number of Liters of the 25% solution
We need 50 liters total, so
x + y = 50
and we need the 50 L to be 35% solution, so
0.4x = 0.25y = 0.35(50)
Solve the first equation for one variable...
x = 50 - y (subtract y from both sides in equation 1)
Now substitute that value into the second equation...
0.4(50 - y) + 0.25y = 17.5 (x becomes 50 - y, 0.35(50) = 17.5)
Now solve for y...
20 - 0.4y + 0.25y = 17.5
-0.15y = -2.5
y = 16.66666667
y = 16 2/3 L
So we need to plug that into the first equation to find 'x'
x + 16 2/3 = 50
x = 50 - 16 2/3
x = 33 1/3
