Answer:
Sally is not right
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the two sequences which have their respective 
terms as following:
Sequence A. 
Sequence B. 
As per Sally, there exists only one number which is in both the sequences.
To find:
Whether Sally is correct or not.
Solution:
For Sally to be correct, we need to put the terms of the respective sequences as equal and let us verify that.
When we talk about terms, 
here is a whole number not a fractional number.
But as per the statement as stated by Sally is a fractional number, only then the two sequences can have a number which is in the both sequences.
Therefore, no number can be in both the sequences A and B.
Hence, Sally is not right.
Answer:
Option A. √(x + 1)
Step-by-step explanation:
Data obtained from the question include:
f(x) = √(x² – 1)
g(x) = √(x – 1)
(f/g) (x) =..?
(x² – 1) => difference of two square
(x² – 1) => (x – 1)(x + 1)
f(x) = √(x² – 1)
f(x) = √(x – 1)(x + 1)
(f/g) (x) = f(x) /g(x)
f(x) = √(x – 1)(x + 1)
g(x) = √(x – 1)
(f/g) (x) = √(x – 1)(x + 1) / √(x – 1)
(f/g) (x) = √[(x – 1)(x + 1) / (x – 1)]
(f/g) (x) = √(x + 1)
Ultimately Woodrow Wilson's preferred direction was not to get involved
with the internal affairs of the USA's near neighbors in Latin America.
However events unfolded that meant his governments ended up being as
interventionist as those of Teddy Roosevelt, for example occupying Haiti
and the Dominican Republic. These activities were not intended plans of
Wilson's in the way that Roosevelt set out to police Latin America but
nonetheless the impact was the same.
<span />
They will need to be it on day 250 because 500/2=250
Hope this helps
Have a happy holidays
