The information given is sufficient for this proof .
Slope of a line passing through x1 ,y1) and ( x2,y2) is given by the formula :
M = ( y2 - y1)/ ( x2-x1)
________________________________
Let us start finding the slope of line PQ
the given points are ( a,b) and ( c,d)
using the slope formula we get :
slope of line PQ = m= ( d-b) /( c-a)
Let us now try finidng slope of the another line P'Q'
It is passing through ( -b ,a) and (-d,c)
using the formula we get slope of P'Q' = m' = ( c-a) /( -d - -b)
m'= ( c-a) /( -d+b)
m'= ( c-a) / -( b-d Let us find the product of m and m' :
( d-b ) * ( c-a)
----------- ------------ = -1
(c-a) - ( b-d)
Because we got product of m and m' = -1 hence proved product of perpendicular lines are negative reciprocal of each other .
Answer:
How much is 44 out of 100 written as a percentage? Convert fraction (ratio) 44 / 100 Answer: 44%
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Question 1 = 1 Question 2 = 2 no eggs remain because 2 eggs needed
Step-by-step explanation:
In the case above, Talib work is not correct as one need to first switch x and y before one can solve for y.
<h3>What is the variables about?</h3>
Note that:
y=-8x+4
y-4=-8x
(y-4)/-8=x
Since the independent variable x is known, one can switch the variable labels and thus it will be:
y=(x-4)/-8
f^-1(x)=(x-4)/-8
This can be written again as:
f^-1(x)=(4-x)/8 :P
Thus one can say No, as he forgot to switch the variable labels after solving for the independent variable.
In the case above, Talib work is not correct as one need to first switch x and y before one can solve for y.
See the first part of the question below
Talib is trying to find the inverse of the function to the right. His work appears beneath it. Is his work correct? Explain your answer.
Learn more about variable from
brainly.com/question/4063302
#SPJ1
Answer:
3
Step-by-step explanation: