Answer:
a.
The money that we will have in account is $51156.41
b.
The money that we will have in account is $318808.31
Explanation:
a.
The deposits made in the account represent an annuity pattern as the deposits made are of a constant amount, are made after equal interval of time and are for a defined time period. Thus, to calculate the value of money that we will have after 19 years, we will use the formula for the future value of annuity.
The formula for the future value of annuity is attached.
FV = 1100 * [ (1+0.091)^19 - 1 / 0.091 ]
FV = $51156.41178
b.
The same formula for the future value of annuity will be used and we will change n from 19 to 38.
FV = 1100 * [ (1+0.091)^38 - 1 / 0.091 ]
FV = $318808.3149
COMPLETE PROBLEM
Lana, a ten-year-old child, is run over by a car negligently driven by Mitchell. Lana, at the time of the accident, was acting reasonably and without negligence. Clark, a newspaper reporter, photographs Lana while she is lying in the street in great pain. Two years later, Perry, the publisher of a newspaper, prints Clark's picture of Lana in his newspaper as a lead to an article concerning the negligence of children. The caption under the picture reads: "They ask to be killed." Lana, who has recovered from the accident, brings suit against Clark and Perry. What result? Explain.
Explanation:
Judgement for Lana against Perry but not against Clark. The facts make out a case against Perry for the tort of invasion of privacy in particular placing another in a false light (INVASION OF PRIVACY:FALSE LIGHT). Section 652E of the restatement imposes liability for publicity which places another in a false light. It is unlikely that Perry could utilize the first amendment as a defense because Lana was neither a public official nor a public figure. Even if that defense were available, it is forfeited if Perry acted with "malice", which appears to be the case here because Perry acted in reckless disregard of the truth. Clark did not commit the tort of intrusion because he photographed an event that occurred in public.
Answer:
$163,100
Explanation:
First find the present value of cashflows at year 1 and 2
<u>PV of $82,400;</u>
PV = FV/(1+r)^n
PV = 82,400/(1.1275)^1
PV = $73082.0399
<u>PV of $148,600;</u>
PV = FV/(1+r)^n
PV = 148,600 /(1.1275)^2
PV = $116,892.2473
From the cumulative present value of 303,764.34, find the balance after deducting the above PVs;
PV of cashflow yr3 = $303,764.34 -$73082.0399 -$116,892.2473
PV of cashflow yr3 = $113,790.053
Next, calculate year 3's cashflow;
Year 3 cashflow = 113790.053(1.1275)^3
Year 3 cashflow = $163,099.996
Expected cashflow in third year is approximately $163,100
Answer:
$1
Explanation:
The marginal cost refers to the cost of producing one additional unit or serving one more customer.
In this case, we have to determine the additional cost of Jacob ordering a burrito instead of a taco. As Mason chose the tacos and they agreed to split the lunch bill evenly, if Jacob decides to eat the tacos, the cost for each of them is:
$3+$3=$6/2= $3
If Jacob decides to eat the burrito:
$3+$5= $8/2= $4
So, the marginal cost to Jacob ordering a burrito is:
$4-$3= $1
Answer:
Scarcity and Utility
I will explain the concepts of scarcity, value, and utility using my laptop and some writing pens. I have only one laptop available in my family. I use it 24-hours daily. I attach so much value (utility) to the laptop because it is only one. It is very scare in my household. On the other hand, I have a packet of writing pens. Pens are relatively not scare in my household. If my laptop is missing, I will raise uproar in the house. Everybody present will answer a tedious query. But, if one of the pens gets missing, I may not even be aware that it is missing. At the moment, I do not attach much value (utility) to the writing pens because I have many of them presently . Writing pens are not scare in my household, as I said earlier.
Using these examples, I have demonstrated the concepts of scarcity, utility, and value.
Explanation:
Therefore, scarcity is defined by the value and the relative availability of a good. Scarcity is a basic economic problem that shows the gap existing between limited resources and unlimited needs. Based on the lack experienced with satisfying a need, one has to always choose between alternatives in order to maximize resource allocation and utility.
Utility in Economics refers to the value or satisfaction derivable from the meeting of a human or economic need. It is initially connected to the concept of scarcity. But after attaining some level of utility, scarcity temporarily evaporates. And this is the dividing thin line. This is why they are mostly used together. "Something that is valuable is scarce and give utility." Something that is not highly valuable is not usual scarce and does not give much utility, at least, to an extent.
