Based on the results of the study, the conclusion which is valid is There is correlation between the increase in the rate of televised political attack ads since the previous congressional election and the rate of voter dissatisfaction in the observed districts.
<h3>What doe
s the study conclude?</h3>
The study showed that the rate of voter dissatisfaction in the districts since the previous election cycles is similar to the rate of increase of televised political attack ads.
The fact that both the rate of voter dissatisfaction and televised political attack ads moved together means that they correlate with each other.
It is important to note however, that correlation does not equate causation so there might be no link between the two rates.
Find out more on correlation at brainly.com/question/26998752
#SPJ1
It's 28/8 but if you want to simplify its 3.5
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>720 %</em>
<em>Step-by-step explanation:</em>
<em>Hi there ! </em>
<em>$ 5 ............. 100%</em>
<em>$ 36 .................x%</em>
<em>x = 36×100/5</em>
<em>= 3600/5</em>
<em>= 720 %</em>
<em>Good luck !</em>
Hello there,
The equation that we have to factor is as follows:
2x² + 3x - 54
In order to factor this we first multiply (-54) by 2 and try to find two factor pairs that can be add up to 3.
For this we would use 12 * -9 which gives you -108 when multiplied and when added you would get 3.
2x² + 12x - 9x -54
2x(x + 6) -9(x +6)
(2x - 9) (x + 6)
Now the factor pairs would be: (2x - 9)(x + 6)
Hope I helped,
Amna
Answer:
a view from the side.
"the parts are shown in the sectioned side view"