B. 107 bc 26.5+34.2= 60.7+45.8= 106.5 round that to be 107.
<h3>
Answer: C) Not congruent</h3>
We have 2 pairs of congruent angles, so we can prove the triangles are similar triangles (using the AA similarity theorem). But we don't have enough information to prove them to be congruent. We would need at least one pair of sides to be congruent so we could use either AAS or ASA.
For instance, if we knew that AT = AP, then we would use AAS. If we knew that HT = MP, then we would use ASA instead. However, we don't have either bit of information like this. The triangles may or may not be congruent. We simply don't have enough information to say either way. We can't definitively say they are congruent, so we just lean toward "not congruent".
Answer: She isn't correct.
Step-by-step explanation: The BODMAS rule must be strictly followed and as such gives different answers to the two expressions.
(12-3)*2 basically gives:
9*2 (Dealing with the bracket first)
18.
While 12-(3*2) while dealing with the bracket first will give:
12-6; which would eventually give
6.
<span>-4 1/2 × -2 1/3
Convert the mixed numbers into improper fractions.
- 9/2 x -7/3
Multiply the numerator by the other numerator and the denominator by the other denominator.
Final Answer: 63/6 or 10 1/2 or 10 3/6 or 10.5 * All answers are equivalent to each other.</span>
Answer:
Jeremiah is correct
Step-by-step explanation:
You did not put an equal sign so it's a bit confusing, but I was taught that whoever has lesser value (-4x) should be added/subtracted to both sides. (I think it's because -6x will make the equation worse). I'm so sorry if my answer is wrong btw. And congratulations if you did get it. I'm just answering based on what I was taught.
