Explanation:
-100 n I think it so check this answer
None of the choices is an acceptable answer.
Light ... as well as all other forms of electromagnetic radiation ... is both. When you run light through an experiment built to detect particles ... such as photoelectric stimulation of electron emission ... the light behaves like a stream of particles. When you set up an experiment built to measure and detect waves ... like reflection, refraction, diffraction, dispersion, constructive and destructive interference ... the light does all of those things too.
Scientists would only debate the question if light absolutely positively had to be one or the other, and could not possibly be both. Such a debate isn't necessary, and scientists no longer waste their time arguing about it. Light is both.
Between Maxwell and Einstein, the wave/particle duality of light had been convincingly demonstrated well over a hundred years ago.
Since green represents land areas where carbon dioxide is being absorbed. The darker the color, the more carbon that location absorbs each year. Since, l<span>ocation A is very green, it absorbs more carbon compared to other locations.</span>
1) they are attracting because if you look at the arrows they’re all pointing the same way.
2) if the magnet was turned around they would do the opposite and not attract ( this is called repulsion)
3) magnetic pole
4)magnet
5) magnetic force
6) magnetism
Hope this helps
6050 J is the kinetic energy at D
<u>Explanation:</u>
In physics, the object's kinetic energy (K.E) defined as the energy it possesses during movement. It can be defined as the required work to accelerate a certain body weight in order to rest at a certain speed. When the body receives this energy as it speeds up (accelerates), it retains this energy unless speed varies. The equation is given as,
Where,
m - mass of an object
v - velocity of the object
Here,
Given data:
m = 100 kg
v = 11 m/s
By substituting the given values in the above equation, we get