1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
grigory [225]
3 years ago
9

How do you behave with the people of other traditions than that of yours?

Social Studies
2 answers:
scoundrel [369]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

with \: respect

Andru [333]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

understand and respect to them

Explanation

when we associate people from different traditions, we can see clear difference.  first of all we should understand respect to their tradition. better relationship can be build by better understanding and respect toward them. we need to understand that they have some different ideas than we do. therefore actions should be taken to minimize conflicts of opinions

You might be interested in
In 1787, Georgia named delegates to attend a convention in Philadelphia. What was the original purpose of this convention?
Lady bird [3.3K]
The original purpose was to break off from King George.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Answer this please ​
cestrela7 [59]

Spain was able to create an empire in tue country. The reason for this choice would be that the Spanish Empire toom territory in the 18th century.

3 0
3 years ago
True or false: A right turn is permitted at a red light unless other restrictions are posted.
Svet_ta [14]

Answer:

it depends on the state or country laws

in washington state  it is true

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ethical criteria for judging appropriate conduct define select one:
shepuryov [24]
C : What is appropriate as determined by some standard of moral conduct.
5 0
3 years ago
Fact Pattern:
Burka [1]

Answer and Explanation:

1. Prosecutors may claim that the inaccurate report to which Rachel had access could induce misinterpretation on her part and that, in any case, Peter was already on the police for vandalism, which contributed to Rachel's conclusion. These justifications would not be successful, because Rachel had many ways to find out what actually happened to Peter.

2. Peter would sue Rachel for defamation and would likely succeed, as he has several witnesses that Rachel released incorrect information and that it affects his reputation.

3. The current malice is necessary in this case because Peter is a very well-known and popular person, and it is important that the current malice is inserted in the case, to speed up the process.

4. The fair report privilege can be used to protect Rachel, since the false information about Peter that she exposed, had as its only source a public document that induced her to publish the defamation.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is true about district courts?
    9·1 answer
  • What was South Africa’s policy of racial segregation called? *
    14·1 answer
  • James, a human resource manager, is preparing materials for an upcoming series of interviews, and has created a set of standardi
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these statements describes what the diagram is showing
    13·2 answers
  • Because she plans on achieving success in marketing, Tammie is taking courses on managing social media. This is an example of __
    9·1 answer
  • When Sandra was 18 years old, she was in a serious car accident. Although she made a full recovery from her injuries, she experi
    8·1 answer
  • The​ ________ strategy is built on the​ win-win philosophy, empathy and ego​ drive, and character and integrity.
    7·1 answer
  • This term is given to a male monarch who is the supreme ruler of a country
    6·2 answers
  • List out important characteristics of good good governance​
    13·1 answer
  • Based on the precedent established in Marbury v. Madison, which scenario is an example of judicial review?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!