R(2)=333*r(1)
C(1)=2πr(1)
C(2)=2πr(2)=2π*333r(1)
C(2)/C(1)=2π*333r(1)/2πr(1)=333
<span>circumference will increase by factor 333</span>
The answer is B. false. Being precise in a measurement needs to be accurate and exact in details. without one factor of its doesn't prove that it would be relevant in information because the measurement is not exact and accurate
Answer:
The inspector's claim has strong statistical evidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
To answer this we have to perform a hypothesis test.
The inspector claimed that the actual proportion of code violations is greater than 0.07, so the null and alternative hypothesis are:

We assume a significance level of 0.05.
The sample size is 200 and the proportion of the sample is:

The standard deviation is

The z-value can be calculated as

The P-value for this z-value is P=0.00914.
This P-value is smaller than the significance level, so the effect is significant and the null hypothesis is rejected.
The inspector's claim has strong statistical evidence.
1. 7x+15y=32
2. x-3y=20/*5
2. 5x-15y=100
1.+2.= >12x=132
x=11
1. 7*11+15y=32
15y= -45
y= -3
x=11;y=-3
<u />