The result of multiplying a person's chronological age by their mental age and multiplying the result by 100 is the Intelligence quotient. Option A is correct.
<h3>What is Intelligence quotient?</h3>
A total score resulting from a set of standardized tests or subtests designed to estimate human intelligence is known as an intelligence quotient.
The intelligence quotient shows the comparative intelligence of a person. It is clearly defined by the following example:
If a 50-year-old woman had a mental age of 20 (that is, executed on the test at the level of an average 50-year-old), he was assigned an IQ of 20/50 × 100. The test used to determine the intelligence quotient is the Stanford-Binet test.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Learn more about the Intelligence quotient, refer to:
brainly.com/question/9642364
Here are the number of suicide rate for the age 65 of older per ethnic group :
<span>Non-Hispanic Whites — 15.8 per 100,000
Asian and Pacific Islanders — 10.6 per 100,000
Hispanics — 7.9 per 100,000
Non-Hispanic Blacks — 5.0 per 100,000
</span>
So the one that has the lower risk of suicide would be : Non-Hispanic Blacks
hope this helps
Answer:
1. the desire to meet a professors expectations
3. the desire to look good to someone else
Explanation:
External motivators refers to the source of motivation that does not come from within yourself. This include things such as rewards given by others, praises , acknowledgement by others, threats given by others, etc.
Let's examine option 1 and 3 :
'1. the desire to meet a professors expectations'
'3. the desire to look good to someone else'
Both sources of motivation exist because you are seeking acknowledgement from other person beside yourself.
in option 2 on the other hand:
'2. the desire to study so that youll do well in a course'
The desires come from within yourself. You want to improve yourself rather than trying to impress and accepted by others.
Answer:
The Scopes Trial, also known as the Scopes Monkey Trial, was the 1925 prosecution of science teacher John Scopes for teaching evolution in a Tennessee public school, which a recent bill had made illegal. The trial featured two of the best-known orators of the era, William Jennings Bryan and Clarence Darrow, as opposing attorneys. The trial was viewed as an opportunity to challenge the constitutionality of the bill, to publicly advocate for the legitimacy of Darwin’s theory of evolution, and to enhance the profile of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
