I believe it’s C I’m not sure but u can check others people answers
According to the fragment it can be inferred that the correct answer is "moving form the details of the individual hieroglyphics..." (option c).
<h3>How to identify the idea of the fragment?</h3>
To identify the idea of the fragment we must take into account the central theme and the details that support this idea. Regarding this fragment, the interpretation that a person made about the hieroglyphs once he saw them is related.
In this case, this person was able to interpret the hieroglyphs as representing both sounds and symbols. (option C).
Learn more about hieroglyphs in: brainly.com/question/441873
#SPJ1
Credibility, It increases their credibility
The correct answer is B: That lizard's eyes were small and shiny. All other options are wrong because the noun was turned into its plural form "lizards," which can't be used with the singular adjective "that." In addition, option C lacks a possessive form and option D includes an "s" after the apostrophe, which should not be used with nouns ending in s.
Answer:
<u>The key details that contribute to the irony in the poem are the following:</u>
*The things that are considered no death, are the ones are not breathing or living.
*Even a pebble lies in a roadway, still it never experiences death. *No matter how grasses are cut, they still grow in the same place.
*Brooks, even though its flow is not that much, still you can see it come and go.
*Despite all these things that are not living, they do not fade nor die. But since a human is strong and wise, makes it the reason why it dies.
Explanation:
The irony in Louis Untermeyer's poem is given by the fact that those things that have no awareness of themselves, like pebbles and dust or sand and streams, live forever. Because that which is not alive cannot die. On the contrary, man, who is strong and intelligent, who is aware of himself and all the things around him and wants to live forever, eventually dies.
