Answer:
Conyers = $38,580
Poodle = $222,420
Explanation:
Annual salary allowance to Poodle of $146,160.
Interest of 6% on each partner's capital balance on January 1.
Any remaining net income divided to Conyers and Poodle, 1:2.
net income $261,000
distribution of interests:
- Conyers = $54,000 x 6% = $3,240
- Poodle = $93,000 x 6% = $5,580
drawings (annual salary allowance):
remaining income = $261,000 - $146,160 - $3,240 - $5,580 = $106,020
- Conyers (1/3) = $35,340
- Poodle (2/3) = $70,680
total distributed:
- Conyers = $3,240 + $35,340 = $38,580
- Poodle = $5.580 + $146,160 + $70,680 = $222,420
Answer:
The correct answer is Generalizability.
Explanation:
The generalizability theory (theory G) allows to measure the reliability of a test by quantifying the importance of each of its sources of variability. The error is redefined, as a condition or facet of measurement, using the generalizability coefficient as a measure to estimate reliability. This approach does not contradict the fundamental approaches of the classical theory of tests, but can be seen as an extension of it.
Answer:
C) person who works well alone
Explanation:
Answer:
a. $25,650
b. Journal entries
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
a. The balance of the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts is
= Total account receivable × estimated percentage
= $570,000 × 4.5%
= $25,650
b. The adjusting entry is as follows
Bad Debt Expense $13,650 ($25,650 - $12,000)
To Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $13,650
(Being the bad debt expense is recorded)
c. The adjusting entry is as follows
Bad Debt Expense $26,650 ($25,650 + $1,000)
To Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $26,650
(Being the bad debt expense is recorded)
