Answer:
$1,521,800
Explanation:
The computation of cost basis is shown below:-
Three cells cost price = 3 × $470,000
= $1,410,000
Combination of rate charges = $30,000 + $16,000 + $39,000 + $3,600
= $88,600
Wages of one foreman = wage per hour × weeks worked × hours per week
= $29 × 5 × 40
= $5,800
Wages of 4 foremen = 4 × $5,800
= $23,200
Three cells cost basis = Three cells cost price + Combination of rate charges + Wages of one foreman
= $1,410,000 + $88,600 + $23,200
= $1,521,800
Answer:
Option C is correct one.
Interest expense 773
Discount on bonds payable 73
Cash 700
Explanation:
2016 interest expense = initial issue price, which is the 1/1/2014 book value x the market (effective) interest rate
= $9,668 x 08
= $773
Cash interest payment
= maturity value of the bond x the stated interest rate = $10,000 x .07
= $700
Amortization of discount on bonds payable
= interest expense - interest cash payment
= $773 - $700.
= $73
Answer: $670
Explanation:
Since the quoted price of $.35, the cost to purchase two WXO 30 call option will be: = $0.35 × 2 = $0.70
Then, the price of RADM 30 call option contract will be calculated as;
= $33.7 - $30
= $3.70
The net gain on one RADM 30 call option will then be:
= $3.70 - $0.35
= $3.35.
Therefore, the net gain on 2 RADM30 call options will be:
= $3.35 × 2
= $6.70
Since there are 100 shares in a option contract, the gain will be:
= $6.70 × 100
= $670
Answer: B. a 2 point capital gain
Explanation:
Municipal Bonds have to be amortized using the straight-line method and this applied to both newly issued or bonds being traded at a premium.
The bond in question is trading at 105 and so has a 5 point premium which needs to be amortized at 1 point a year for 5 years. As it was bought after two years, the amortization was 2 points which means the cost of the bond should be;
105 - 2 = 103
Yet it was sold for 105. The gain is therefore
= 105 - 103
= 2 point capital gain
Answer:
groupthink
Explanation:
In team discussions and debates, groupthink is a common phenomenon where team members tend to agree with others without a constructive discussion filled with arguments. It is very common when an authoritative person (manager) is leading the discourse of discussion.
In this example, the reached consensus is an example of groupthink, since the team members did not critically evaluate the troublesome issue.
