Old price: p1 = $ 3.90;
New price: p2 = $ 3.40.
The percentual decrease is given by
d(%) = [ (p2 - p1) / p1 ] * 100 %
d(%) = [ (3.40 - 3.90) / 3.90 ] * 100 %
d(%) = [ - 0.50 / 3.90 ] * 100 %
d(%) = - 0.128 * 100 %
d(%) = - 12.8 % (approximately)
So the price fell 12.8 % approximately.
I hope this helps. =)
Answer:
B. 2/3
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve this we have to take into account this axioms:
- The total probability is always equal to 1.
- The probability of a randomly selected point being inside the circle is equal to one minus the probability of being outside the circle.
Then, if the probabilities are proportional to the area, we have 1/3 probability of selecting a point inside a circle and (1-1/3)=2/3 probability of selecting a point that is outside the circle.
Then, the probabilty that a random selected point inside the square (the total probability space) and outside the circle is 2/3.
1(1)/(4)-:3= 5/12
5/12 of a cup or 0.146 with a bar on top because the 6 goes on forever.
Answer:
Its not a real number for the square roots of negative number
its not possible... 
= -2 x -2 no... 2 x 2 no..... -2 x 2 yea but thats not square root anymore...
Step-by-step explanation:
Give me brainliest!!!
Answer:
(50000000 ≤ P ≤ 90000000)
Step-by-step explanation:
The chart represents annual profits in millions of dollars. From the chart, the least annual profit is 50 million dollars and that was is the year 2009.
The highest annual profit is 90 million dollars and that was is the year 2012.
The compound inequality representing the annual profits P(in millions or dollars) from 2006 to 2013 would be
(50000000 ≤ P ≤ 90000000)
