Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not provide any options, we can say that the idea that people will modify their own behavior as a result of observing other individuals being rewarded and punished for different behaviors is part of the Social Learning Theory.
Albert Bandura developed the concept of Social Learning Theory by studying people's behaviors and how they model their attitudes, relationships, and emotional reactions in their daily interactions. In simpler terms, bandura thinks that people learn by observing each other's behaviors. People can observe, imitate, and establish models to understand the way they act.
How to put this app in Portuguese (use on iPad)?
Population is the right answer
Not true, each religion has a different meaning. Each religion supports something, not always the samething.
