Suppose a student hypothesized that mice would grow best if fed raw pasta. He fed one mouse the raw pasta, another mouse was fed
apple slices, and another mouse received no food Both the raw pasta mouse and the control mouse had lost mass by the end of two days but the apple slice mouse gained mass. The student concludes that his hypothesis is not supported by his data. Which of the following is the next step? Generate a new hypothesis. T/F
<h2>Answer is "True" Generate a new hypothesis</h2>
Explanation:
Due to the false hypothesis a student create a new hypothesis for the research.the hypothesis gives the objective to the research and the methodology to complete the work.
If the student doesn't generate the correct the methodology hence, its work is not proficient to the research that's why the student try to do new analysis with new ideas.
This is because the hypothesis is a conditional explanation about the connection between at least two factors. It is a particular, testable expectation about what you hope to occur in an investigation. For instance, an investigation intended to take a gander at the connection between lack of sleep and test execution may have a hypothesis that expresses, "This examination is intended to evaluate the theory that restless individuals will perform more awful on a test than people who are not sleepless.
So, the right answer is true "Generate a new hypothesis" is the next step.
Color is the least reliable property for mineral identification. The same mineral can come in a variety of colors and different minerals can be the same color. The color can change over time do to weathering.
I tend to disagree with this statement because predators actually have a place in ecosystems to keep prey species from becoming overpopulated, hence, the extent of the overpopulation would likely have been much less if the natural predators were allowed to play a role in controlling the deer population.
