Answer:
WSR's stock = 100
HCC's stock = 50
SNDK stock = 50
Explanation:
let W = WSR's stock
let H = HCC's stock
let S = SNDK stock
W + H +S = 200
16W + 56H + 80S = 8,400
(16 X 7%)W + (56 X 2%)H + (80 X 2%)S = 1.12W + 1.12H + 1.6S = 248
-1.12(W + H +S) = -1.12 x 200
-1.12W - 1.12H - 1.12S = -224
1.12W + 1.12H + 1.6S = 248
0.48S = 24
S = 24/0.48 = 50
W + H + S = W + H + 50 = 200
W + H = 150
16W + 56H + 80S = 16W + 56H + 4,000 =8,400
16W + 56H = 4,400
-16(W + H) = -16 X 150
-16W -16H = -2,400
16W + 56H = 4,400
40H = 2,000
H = 2,000 / 40 = 50
W + H +S = 200
W + 50 + 50 = 200
W + 100 = 200
W = 100
Answer:
(a) $50,980.35
(b) $5,129.90
(c) $2,400
(d) $50,980.35
(e) $5,129.90
(f) $2,400
Explanation:
A constant payment for a specified period is called annuity. The future value of the annuity can be calculated using a required rate of return.
Formula for Future value of annuity is
F = P * ([1 + I]^N - 1 )/I
P =Payment amount
I = interest rate
N = Number of periods
(a) $1,000 per year for 16 years at 14%
F = $1,000 x ([1 + 14%]^16 - 1 )/14%
F = $50,980.35
(b) $500 per year for 8 years at 7%
F = $500 x ([1 + 7%]^8 - 1 )/7%
F = $5,129.90
(c) $600 per year for 4 years at 0%.
F = $600 x 4
F = $2,400
(d) $1,000 per year for 16 years at 14%
F = $1,000 x ([1 + 14%]^16 - 1 )/14%
F = $50,980.35
(e) $500 per year for 8 years at 7%
F = $500 x ([1 + 7%]^8 - 1 )/7%
F = $5,129.90
(f) $600 per year for 4 years at 0%.
F = $600 x 4
F = $2,400
Answer:
Identifying how the company can potentially leverage its core competency into international sales.
Answer:
Yearly rate of return=25%
Monthly rate of return=0.0187%
Explanation:
Given present amount=$12
Given Future amount=$15
Using equation
Where F is the future amount,P is the present amount and is the interest rate.
As n=12 since there are 12 months in the year and if calculate yearly n=1
15=12(1+i)^12
i=0.0187% monthly
Answer:
c. fiscal and monetary policies that impact aggregate demand do not impact the natural rate of unemployment.
Explanation:
Short run Philips Curve is downward sloping, due to inverse relationship between unemployment rate & inflation rate. High economic activity implies more inflation rate, less unemployment. Low economic activity implies less inflation rate, more unemployment.
However, the inverse relationship between inflation & unemployment is only in short run & not in long run. In long run, this inflation - unemployment trade off doesn't exist. So, any fiscal or monetary policy affecting aggregate demand & consecutively inflation rate, do not affect the natural rate of unemployment (combination of frictional & structural unemployment rate) in long run.
