Answer:
It is a violation of NASD rules against guaranteeing a customer against loss.
Explanation:
In this case the RR is guaranteeing the customer against loss. The customer initially bought the shares for $20 the new price is $10. The RR now coming in to buy the shares above market value is a way to guarantee the customer against loss, and its a NASD violation.
The answer is B.
Hope this helps!
(:
Answer and Explanation:
The computation of the total budgeted selling and administrative expenses is shown below;
Utilities expense $2,800
Administrative salaries $100,000
Sales commissions 5 % of sales i.e. 5% of $860,000 $43,000
Advertising $20,000
Depreciation on store equipment $50,000
Rent on administration building $60,000
Miscellaneous administrative expenses $10,000
total budgeted selling and administrative expenses $285,800
It is true that Opportunity costs at a manufacturing company are not part of manufacturing overhead.
<h3>What is
Opportunity costs ?</h3>
Opportunity costs can be described as the term that represent the potential benefits which individual, investor, misses out in the process of choosing one alternative over another.
Because opportunity costs are unseen can be easily overlooked, therefore, in this case, It is true that Opportunity costs at a manufacturing company are not part of manufacturing overhead.
Learn more on Opportunity costs at:
brainly.com/question/1549591
#SPJ1
"The length of stay at your current residence" is the one among the following choices given in the question that is the data <span>used to determine credit scores. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option or the penultimate option. I hope the answer comes to your help.</span>
