1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
goldenfox [79]
3 years ago
5

Prompt

Social Studies
2 answers:
vodka [1.7K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

I agree, I have come to many situations where I am not sure what to say. It always comes down to two paths and only one will be right, the first path is truth, it may be a hard path where you need a lot of willpower, but it is the right path, the second path is lie, this path may look so simple, but this path is a dark path where you can't see or know what is going to happen next. It may look easy but not everything is what it seems.

Explanation:

svlad2 [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Knowing how to summarize something you have read, seen, or heard is a valuable skill, one you have probably used in many writing assignments. It is important, though, to recognize when you must go beyond describing, explaining, and restating texts and offer a more complex analysis. This handout will help you distinguish between summary and analysis and avoid inappropriate summary in your academic writing.

Is summary a bad thing?

Not necessarily. But it’s important that your keep your assignment and your audience in mind as you write. If your assignment requires an argument with a thesis statement and supporting evidence—as many academic writing assignments do—then you should limit the amount of summary in your paper. You might use summary to provide background, set the stage, or illustrate supporting evidence, but keep it very brief: a few sentences should do the trick. Most of your paper should focus on your argument. (Our handout on argument will help you construct a good one.)

Writing a summary of what you know about your topic before you start drafting your actual paper can sometimes be helpful. If you are unfamiliar with the material you’re analyzing, you may need to summarize what you’ve read in order to understand your reading and get your thoughts in order. Once you figure out what you know about a subject, it’s easier to decide what you want to argue.

You may also want to try some other pre-writing activities that can help you develop your own analysis. Outlining, freewriting, and mapping make it easier to get your thoughts on the page. (Check out our handout on brainstorming for some suggested techniques.)

Why is it so tempting to stick with summary and skip analysis?

Many writers rely too heavily on summary because it is what they can most easily write. If you’re stalled by a difficult writing prompt, summarizing the plot of The Great Gatsby may be more appealing than staring at the computer for three hours and wondering what to say about F. Scott Fitzgerald’s use of color symbolism. After all, the plot is usually the easiest part of a work to understand. Something similar can happen even when what you are writing about has no plot: if you don’t really understand an author’s argument, it might seem easiest to just repeat what he or she said.

To write a more analytical paper, you may need to review the text or film you are writing about, with a focus on the elements that are relevant to your thesis. If possible, carefully consider your writing assignment before reading, viewing, or listening to the material about which you’ll be writing so that your encounter with the material will be more purposeful. (We offer a handout on reading towards writing.)

How do I know if I’m summarizing?

As you read through your essay, ask yourself the following questions:

Am I stating something that would be obvious to a reader or viewer?

Does my essay move through the plot, history, or author’s argument in chronological order, or in the exact same order the author used?

Am I simply describing what happens, where it happens, or whom it happens to?

A “yes” to any of these questions may be a sign that you are summarizing. If you answer yes to the questions below, though, it is a sign that your paper may have more analysis (which is usually a good thing):

Am I making an original argument about the text?

Have I arranged my evidence around my own points, rather than just following the author’s or plot’s order?

Am I explaining why or how an aspect of the text is significant?

Certain phrases are warning signs of summary. Keep an eye out for these:\.

.).

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Pls help i dont have long<br>its a b c or d
lubasha [3.4K]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who is the president of london​
Len [333]

Answer:

boris Johnson as he is the velocity of my grandad

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to missouri law, __________ must wear seat belts if the driver holds an intermediate driver license
Westkost [7]

Answer:

All passengers

Explanation:

Everyone has to wear seat belts, no matter the age or the type of license

6 0
1 year ago
Describe the importance and significance of research in effectively planning and executing a public relations program. Provide l
Zina [86]

Explanation:

Public relations can be understood as a strategic communication process that companies use to build relationships that promote mutual benefits between companies and their target audience.

Surveys are an extremely effective tool for the formulation of strategic public relations plans, so it is necessary that they be conducted in line with the company's objectives, to eliminate weaknesses and increase the perception capacity of how employees and the public see the company. Through opinion polls and data collection, it is possible for the company to obtain subsidies that will help it find the points that the company's image needs to be improved, assisting in better decision making by public relations employees in order to positively affect the vision of the target audience.

3 0
4 years ago
The exclusionary rule states that: A. all guilty people must be set free if police have used force against them. B. evidence obt
Marat540 [252]

Answer:

Option B

Explanation:

Evidences that have been analyzed in violation to the right of a defendant can't be used or presented in the court of law, just like the option states ,it has violated the rights and according to the law should not be used in presenting a case to the judge , so option B best explains what the exclusionary rules states.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Analyze Because of strict operating standards, franchisees typically do not have
    12·1 answer
  • How is Great Britain different from the United Kingdom
    12·1 answer
  • After making a New Year's resolution to eat healthy foods, you decide to have a bite of ice cream and end up eating most of a ca
    15·1 answer
  • The hypodermic-needle research model might be considered the opposite of which research model?
    12·1 answer
  • A teacher is having difficulty at work hearing and understanding the students especially when the classroom is noisy, and has co
    8·1 answer
  • QUIZ:What is George w. bush's middle name?
    8·2 answers
  • Groups like ku klux klan resist reconstruction by
    14·2 answers
  • Define sculpture, which is the oldest painting sulpture of Nepal​
    7·1 answer
  • Which infant temperament is associated with babies
    6·1 answer
  • Counselors have an ethical obligation to develop sensitivity to _______________ and to help clients make decisions that are cong
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!