1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
goldenfox [79]
3 years ago
5

Prompt

Social Studies
2 answers:
vodka [1.7K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

I agree, I have come to many situations where I am not sure what to say. It always comes down to two paths and only one will be right, the first path is truth, it may be a hard path where you need a lot of willpower, but it is the right path, the second path is lie, this path may look so simple, but this path is a dark path where you can't see or know what is going to happen next. It may look easy but not everything is what it seems.

Explanation:

svlad2 [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Knowing how to summarize something you have read, seen, or heard is a valuable skill, one you have probably used in many writing assignments. It is important, though, to recognize when you must go beyond describing, explaining, and restating texts and offer a more complex analysis. This handout will help you distinguish between summary and analysis and avoid inappropriate summary in your academic writing.

Is summary a bad thing?

Not necessarily. But it’s important that your keep your assignment and your audience in mind as you write. If your assignment requires an argument with a thesis statement and supporting evidence—as many academic writing assignments do—then you should limit the amount of summary in your paper. You might use summary to provide background, set the stage, or illustrate supporting evidence, but keep it very brief: a few sentences should do the trick. Most of your paper should focus on your argument. (Our handout on argument will help you construct a good one.)

Writing a summary of what you know about your topic before you start drafting your actual paper can sometimes be helpful. If you are unfamiliar with the material you’re analyzing, you may need to summarize what you’ve read in order to understand your reading and get your thoughts in order. Once you figure out what you know about a subject, it’s easier to decide what you want to argue.

You may also want to try some other pre-writing activities that can help you develop your own analysis. Outlining, freewriting, and mapping make it easier to get your thoughts on the page. (Check out our handout on brainstorming for some suggested techniques.)

Why is it so tempting to stick with summary and skip analysis?

Many writers rely too heavily on summary because it is what they can most easily write. If you’re stalled by a difficult writing prompt, summarizing the plot of The Great Gatsby may be more appealing than staring at the computer for three hours and wondering what to say about F. Scott Fitzgerald’s use of color symbolism. After all, the plot is usually the easiest part of a work to understand. Something similar can happen even when what you are writing about has no plot: if you don’t really understand an author’s argument, it might seem easiest to just repeat what he or she said.

To write a more analytical paper, you may need to review the text or film you are writing about, with a focus on the elements that are relevant to your thesis. If possible, carefully consider your writing assignment before reading, viewing, or listening to the material about which you’ll be writing so that your encounter with the material will be more purposeful. (We offer a handout on reading towards writing.)

How do I know if I’m summarizing?

As you read through your essay, ask yourself the following questions:

Am I stating something that would be obvious to a reader or viewer?

Does my essay move through the plot, history, or author’s argument in chronological order, or in the exact same order the author used?

Am I simply describing what happens, where it happens, or whom it happens to?

A “yes” to any of these questions may be a sign that you are summarizing. If you answer yes to the questions below, though, it is a sign that your paper may have more analysis (which is usually a good thing):

Am I making an original argument about the text?

Have I arranged my evidence around my own points, rather than just following the author’s or plot’s order?

Am I explaining why or how an aspect of the text is significant?

Certain phrases are warning signs of summary. Keep an eye out for these:\.

.).

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Is it important to tell someone they are doing a good job or should we just expect it from them?
avanturin [10]
In my opinion no it is not necessary to do people there doing a good job. But it does make the other person feel better . But you cannot give a person to much glory for then they will only strive to hear good feed back and not be use to hearing constructive negative comments .
5 0
3 years ago
What is the differences and similarities to verbal and non-verbal communication?
Mademuasel [1]
Nonverbal communication is similar to verbal communication in four respects: it is symbolic, it is<span>rule-guided, it may be intentional or unintentional, and it reflects culture. Hope this helps</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write two or three sentences explaining the relationship between communism and repression
shusha [124]
Communism is mostly linked to repression because of the Soviet Union. The connection can be seen because it is against human nature to want to share all earning absolutely equally, so in order to get people to do this the government must step in and repress.
7 0
4 years ago
A little boy is allowed to play with a laboratory rat and shows no fear of it. then, a scientist makes a scary noise by banging
Alexxandr [17]
The scary noise in the scenario in which a little boy is allowed to play with a laboratory rat and shows no fear of it. then,and  a scientist makes a scary noise by banging an iron bar whenever the little boy reaches for the rat and because of this the boy begins crying whenever the rat comes near him is <span> unconditioned stimulus.
</span><span> Unconditioned stimulus is a stimulus that naturally, and automatically triggers a response. In this case such stimulus is the noise.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
After making makes a series of observations of a certain phenomenon in a laboratory, a scientist develops a theory that explains
Gekata [30.6K]

Answer:

Try to change his theory to correlate with the new observations, otherwise, discard his theory.

Explanation:

For scientist to develop a thoery, he must be able to follow the following steps:

1. Making of observation

2. List out questions relating to the object of research

3. Create hypotheses

4. Form prediction on the basis of hypotheses

5. Test the prediction

6. Perform iteration

Hence, if the predictions of the theory correlates with the results of the test, the theory will be temporarily confirmed. Otherwise, the scientist should try to change his theory to correlates or be in accordance with the new observations and, if he cannot do so, discard his theory.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • It's incorrect dumbfluck
    6·1 answer
  • The exact geographic location of a place on Earth is?
    14·2 answers
  • Es elprimero el huevo o la gallina?
    11·1 answer
  • According to __________ Theory of General Evolution, society, like a biological organism, has various interdependent parts (such
    13·1 answer
  • Sandy is trying to decide which new soft drink to try. she decides to try "bliss mist" because it has a prettier bottle and the
    11·1 answer
  • Jerry, a 45-year-old chronic alcoholic, has recently begun experiencing memory loss and coordination problems. His doctor inform
    11·1 answer
  • Mr. Peterson has been struggling with Arnold, a boy with severe disabilities who hums and rocks back and forth intermittently th
    11·1 answer
  • How does the law of conservation of mass apply to physical and chemical change?
    15·1 answer
  • What branch of government impeaches the president?.
    5·2 answers
  • sometines when we work with a group a discussion of the issue only makes the group more committed to the intial viewpoint it's a
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!