It is I think compound-complex? I may be wrong or it’s just complex I am sorry for a not definite response
The correct answer is option "A. How the antagonist opposes other characters in the story.
"
The antagonist is the restricting power in a story. It could be a human enemy, or it could be non-human, similar to a creature or something less substantial, similar to fear. The antagonist assumes a vital part in story improvement. Consider a most loved motion picture you jump at the chance to watch. In the event that there is antagonist in a story or motion picture, this is on the grounds that there is a type of enemy. The protagonist in the story is looking for determination; the antagonist opposes such determination, however all great stories require antagonists.
<span>When evaluating sources for a compare-and-contrast paragraph, you can tell if a source’s argument is objective if it A. </span><span>appeals to logic and reason rather than emotion.
A source's argument is objective when it is not influenced by personal feelings or opinions. Objective arguments represent only the facts and not opinions.</span>
The answer to the question is :
<span>Rude Institution
because
</span>
<span>"oh indian removal"
was very offensive
</span>
Imagination and vivid wording to captivate the reader.
