Answer:
<u>B) No, there was insufficient consideration because Sue did not promise anything in exchange</u>
Explanation:
Remember, in law for there to be consideration there must be something of value (between the parties concerned, which is exchanged for the performance or promise of performance by the other party (such performance itself is consideration).
Thus, it could be said that Marcy's agreement to throw a party for Sue lacked insufficient consideration since there was no stated value because Sue did not promise anything in exchange.
Answer:
B. new production processes may be devised.
Explanation:
This means, the new capital in touch with the human innovation traits will generated ways to use this capital beyond their inventors knowledge. Giving the capital additional used. Assthis uses were discovered after the capital invention, are not included in the cost of the new capital therefore, are positive externalities of their.
Also, generally the labor productivity increases with new capital not decrease.
On yt? or what bc ill sub just for it as long as you sub back mine is vxisz on yt
C. An increase in the price of piano parts(raw materials). Makes the firm purchase less raw materials(piano parts) to manufacture less finished goods(pianos) therefore less products(pianos) will be supplied.
Answer:
Option A) passion those it halp
