D is the answer
Hope this helps
Answer:
O(N!), O(2N), O(N2), O(N), O(logN)
Explanation:
N! grows faster than any exponential functions, leave alone polynomials and logarithm. so O( N! ) would be slowest.
2^N would be bigger than N². Any exponential functions are slower than polynomial. So O( 2^N ) is next slowest.
Rest of them should be easier.
N² is slower than N and N is slower than logN as you can check in a graphing calculator.
NOTE: It is just nitpick but big-Oh is not necessary about speed / running time ( many programmers treat it like that anyway ) but rather how the time taken for an algorithm increase as the size of the input increases. Subtle difference.
A. yield to the car on your right
<span>The modf() function will do this for you:
double x, y, d;
x = -14.876;
y = modf(x, &d);
printf("Fractional part = %lf\n", y);
</span>
The principles of creating equations are the same in
PowerPoint 2007 and later. Assuming Danny is using PowerPoint 2010, he will
click on the insert tab then go ahead and choose the Equation in the symbols
group.
Dani will be able to click on the equation option and use the Equation
Tools Design tab or click on the drop down arrow to view more equations
