Answer:
-0.7 m/sec
Explanation:
Mass of first block = m1 =3.0 kg
Mass of second block = m2= 5.0 kg
Velocity of first block = V1= 1.2 m/s
Velocity of second block = V2 = ?
Momentum of Center of mass MVcom is sum of both blocks momentum and is given by
MVcom= m1v1+m2v2
Where
M= mass of center of mass
Vcom= Velocity of center of mass=0 m/s (because center of mass is at rest , so Vcom = 0 m.sec)
Putting values, we get;
0= 3×1.2+5v2
==> v2= 3.6/5= - 0.7 m/s
-ve sign indicates that block 2 is moving in opposite direction of block 1
I was about to say: because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.
"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science.
First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news. Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.
Second, let's face it. The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.
There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned. But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.
That's pretty much why.
Answer:
a. λ = 647.2 nm
b. I₀ 9.36 x 10⁻⁵
Explanation:
Given:
β = 56.0 rad , θ = 3.09 ° , γ = 0.170 mm = 0.170 x 10⁻³ m
a.
The wavelength of the radiation can be find using
β = 2 π / γ * sin θ
λ = [ 2π * γ * sin θ ] / β
λ = [ 2π * 0.107 x 10⁻³m * sin (3.09°) ] / 56.0 rad
λ = 647.14 x 10⁻⁹ m ⇒ λ = 647.2 nm
b.
The intensity of the central maximum I₀
I = I₀ (4 / β² ) * sin ( β / 2)²
I = I₀ (4 / 56.0²) * [ sin (56.0 /2) ]²
I = I₀ 9.36 x 10⁻⁵
No. the answer to the question if can an argon atom undergo vibrational motion is no. it can not even spin either. the argon atom, or the argon is a chemical element that is the third most abundant gas in the earth's atmosphere. it is ore than twice as abundance as water vapor. Thank you for this question.
Answer:
2,87 * 
Explanation:
When the bullets meet at the center and collide, since momentum is a vectoral quantity, their momentum vectors even up and are sumof zero. Formula of momentum is P = m.v , where m is mass and v is velocity. Let’s name the first two bullets as x,y and the one which mass is unknown as z. Then calculate momentum of x and y:
Px= 5,30 * * 301 = 1,5953 kg*m/s
Py= 5,30 * * 301 = 1,5953 kg*m/s
The angle between x and y bullets is 120°, and we know that if the angle between two equal magnitude vectors is 120°, the magnitude of the resultant vector will be equal to first two and placed in exact middle of two vectors. So we can say total momentum of x and y (Px+Py) equals to 1,5953 kg*m/s as well (Shown in the figure).
For z bullet to equalize the total momentum of x and y bullets, it needs to have the same amount of momentum in the opposite way.
Pz = 1,5953 = m * 554
m = 2,87 * kg
