Answer:
Under home rule, Indian citizens would remain part of the British empire but would govern themselves.
Explanation:
Answer: I think it’s D
Explanation: hope this helps
Open range,in U.S. history, the areas of public domain north of Texas where from about 1866 to 1890 more than 5,000,000 cattle <span>were </span><span>driven to fatten and be shipped off to slaughter. The open ranges of western </span>Kansas<span>, </span>Nebraska<span>, the Dakotas, </span>Montana<span>, </span>Wyoming<span>, and other western states and territories served as huge pasturelands for the herds of the Texas ranchmen.</span>
So according to British writer Samuel Johnson in his 1775 pamphlet, Taxation No Tyranny, the complaint of his statement appears to address that, one should not complain of the value of things that he left from the place he came from, just to transfer to a different place. It was your choice in leaving a country that you may only have little, but you have the "voice" (vote) as a citizen, and you exchanged it for a place of having great property but you have no vote. Hope this answer helps.