The Special Court of Appeals’ arguments that Dabney could not commit attempted fourth-degree burglary is that thinking of the crime does not make you a criminal and thus, the defendant can not be convicted of a non-exsitence crime.
<h3>What is the case of Dabney v. State?</h3>
The defender "Dabney" was convicted for attempt 4th degree burglary but appealed on the grounds he did not actually commit it.
Hence, he could not be convicted of actus reus of being on the property no criminal significance in its own right absent the mens rea of an intent to commit theft.
Read more about Dabney v. State
brainly.com/question/26537644
#SPJ1
<u>Embezzlement</u> is the theft or misuse of <u>company funds by executives </u>
Explanation:
<u>Embezzlement, refers to the act of withholding the assets of a company with the intention of conversion(theft) by one or more person to whom the assets where entrusted .It is a type of financial fraud</u>
Only when a significant legal issue arises can a second appeal be made. Every appeal has a specific window of time in which it must be submitted.
<h3>Can you make a second appeal of the same ruling?</h3>
You can usually only appeal to the court that is directly above the trial court that made the decision in your case; whether you can appeal your case more than once depends on a variety of different criteria. However, the appeal may not always be heard by the appeals court.
<h3>What is the appeals ceiling?</h3>
There is a time limit for each appeal that it must be submitted within. The Limitation Act of 1963 includes such a restriction. The following limitation applies to appeals of civil judgments issued by subordinate courts: 90 days following the date of the decree are allowed for a High Court appeal.
To know more about appeal visit:
brainly.com/question/8643122
#SPJ4
Answer:
GHB Sdn Bhd and Sandhu
The prospect for Sandhu to recover the extra commission negotiated with Ahmad during golf is very remote.
1. It was made under undue influence, when Ahmad could have lacked the capacity to make a binding contract. In addition, at that time, Sandhu disclosed that the land was being sought after by many other parties as a way of piling unnecessary pressure on Ahmad.
2. There was no intention to create a legal relation because the additional commission represents a counter-offer. Since the earlier offer was fully documented, this additional offer should have also followed the same process if the company intended to be legally bound.
3. There is lack of consideration to back this additional contract. In the first place, the main contract with Sandhu was made in view of his negotiation skills. So what is Sandhu expected to offer the company in exchange for the extra commission? Nothing.
Explanation:
GHB cannot be expected to promise 0.5% extra commission on a deal, which was equivalent to RM2 million, when an already executed contract for 3% commission had been reached. One can also claim that Ahmad, who suffered from occasional dementia, could have made the promise without the intention for it to be binding on his company but as a way of encouraging Sandhu to close the deal in favor of GHB. Was the deal closed because of the extra commission? No.
A.
Some conditions that might have led Samuel's decision to commit a crime could've been students picking him, making fun of him, bullying him. Anything that had to do with other students acting negative to Samuel is what I think is the reason Samuel made this decision.
B.
There's a bunch of things that could've been done to help Samuel. Such as discussing the issue to his parents or sibling, telling the principal what the problem was, etc. Samuel would just need someone to talk to about what was going on, this would probably help him. <em>"Were there signs at school or home that he was at risk? </em><em>I don't understand what this means sorry.</em>
C.
There are barely any at my previous school that I used to attend. Some additional measures that would need to be added would be weapon, drug, etc., detected doors, staff members checking students' bags, etc.
