Answer:
E. focus on just one point on the painting to obtain a sense of the gestalt.
Explanation:
It all depends on the profits
In a situation where the authorized sources do not provide sufficient guidance, the best thing is D. Ask your Security Manager or Facility Security Officer (FSO).
This question here relates to classified information. It should be noted that security classification guides are the main sources for the derivative classification.
When the authorized sources do not provide sufficient guidance, one should ask their Security Manager or Facility Security Officer (FSO).
Learn more about security on:
brainly.com/question/25720881
Answer:
Option A, openness, is the right answer.
Explanation:
The Big Five personality traits is another name for the five-factor model, which is the terminology for personality traits. The following are the five factors of personality traits:
1. Openness to experience
2. Conscientiousness
3. Extraversion
4. Agreeableness
5. Neuroticism
The given case is the case of Openness to experience because the five facets of Openness involves intense imagination, artistic sensibility, attentiveness to inner sensations, preference for quality, and rational questioning. All these facets, in the given situation, are associated with Garner and thus the given case is the presents the personality dimension of Openness.
Answer:
b. Argument; conclusion: From a historical point of view, genetics is a young science.
Explanation:
An argumentative text or essay is one that proffers some premises which are then followed by a conclusion. It follows a logical order where the premises offer reasons why the conclusion should be accepted as true.<em> Sometimes. however, the conclusion can come before the premises. </em>The writer of this text wants us to believe that genetics is a young science. This is the conclusion. He then goes on to provide historical proof or statements of facts that support this conclusion.
So the excerpt is not just a narrative of the origin and growth of the study of genetics over time and its condition today. It is an argument to support the fact that genetics is a young science.
