We square the residuals when using the least-squares line method to find the line of best fit because we believe that huge negative residuals (i.e., points well below the line) are just as harmful as large positive residuals (i.e., points that are high above the line).
<h3>What do you mean by Residuals?</h3>
We treat both positive and negative disparities equally by squaring the residual values. We cannot discover a single straight line that concurrently minimizes all residuals. The average (squared) residual value is instead minimized.
We might also take the absolute values of the residuals rather than squaring them. Positive disparities are viewed as just as harmful as negative ones under both strategies.
To know more about the Least-Squares Line method, visit:
brainly.com/question/14940432
#SPJ4
Answer:
so what are we trying to figure out?
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
5x
Step-by-step explanation:
I think the problem was.
3(3x - 2y) - (4x - 6y)
9x - 6y - 4x + 6y
5x
Let's solve for x.
−x+9y=−5
Step 1: Add -9y to both sides.
−x+9y+−9y=−5+−9y
−x=−9y−5
Step 2: Divide both sides by -1.
−x ÷ −1 = −9y−5 ÷ −1
x=9y+5
THE ANSWER FOR THE OTHER EQUATION: (x-5y=1)
Let's solve for x.
x−5y=1
Step 1: Add 5y to both sides.
x−5y+5y=1+5y
x=5y+1
Answer:
x=5y+1
I hope this helped I was a little confused on what your problem meant...so if this is not what you asked for just lmk so I can fix it for you :)
Hello!
To find the total cost, we will need to multiply the cost per square meter, by the total area. To find the area we will use the formula A=<span>πr</span>². We will use 3.14 for pi.
We know that 2.1 is our radius. We will square it and then multiply it by 3.14.
2.1²=4.41
4.41(3.14)≈13.85
Our area is about 13.85. Now we will multiply by $1.70 to find the total cost. This gives us about $23.55.
The total cost of the glass would be about $23.55.
I hope this helps!
