Answer:
The correct approach is Option B (Peer Review).
Explanation:
- Rather made reference to someone as a scientific peer-review, it encourages the specialist who has not been essential to the study team to analyze the study objectively and pointed out everyone's mistakes. It serves as major self-regulation for scholars and aims to make the publishing process somewhat credible. Hence, the solution to this issue is Peer Examination.
- Funding organizations rarely have the capabilities to recognize out mistakes, whereas definitive analysis is a method of study that helps to make a definitive statement. The gathering of data is simply a process of scientific study.
Other approaches do not apply to the example mentioned. Although the one mentioned is right.
From Ideal Gas Equation
PV = nRT
V = nRT/ P
= (0.5/12)*0.82*-20/1.5
=0.042*0.82*-20/1.5
Volume = 0.46
Density = 0.5/0.46
= 1.08 gm/cc
( Option D)
Here, the number of protons are different. As they have different atomic numbers, it would be: "Isobars"
Hope this helps!
If a sample transmits 75% of the incident light, its absorbance would be 0.125 Au.
The absorbance of a sample is calculated from the percentage of incident light transmitted using the following formula:
Absorbance = 2 – log(%T), where %T = percentage of incident light transmitted.
In this case, %T = 75, the formula becomes:
Absorbance = 2 - log 75
= 2 - 1.875
= 0.125 Au
More on absorbance can be found here: brainly.com/question/2395738