Answer:
They wanted the government to move the Native Americans to the Plains so the whites could settle in the Southeast for farming.
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did not attach the video or a link to it.
However, we can comment on the following based on our knowledge of the topic.
It is my understanding that narco-terrorism is a serious issue and a real threat to national security for the following reasons.
1.- We are talking about organized crime groups that have all the money to buy weapons, bodyguards, loyal followers, and paramilitary people.
2.- They are part of an international network of organized crime that operates in different countries, including the United States.
3.- These criminal organizations can corrupt the military, federal, and state governments in different countries. That is why they can operate in secrecy and their leaders are seldom identified or caught by the police.
That is why Pablo Escobar's The King of Cocaine,' arguably the most notorious narco-terrorist / drug lord of all time, and other people can operate lucrative criminal organizations exporting drugs, generating violence and corruption through the use of bribes, and corrupt entire governments in different countries.
Answer:
The Supreme Court case known as Kelo v. City of New London was controversial because it allowed greater use of the power of eminent domain.
Explanation:
Kelo v. City of New London is a judgment of the US Supreme Court on whether the government can expropriating private property and transferring it to another private entity, with the purpose of economic development of the city. The plaintiff, Kelo, was the resident of the requisitioned land, and the defendant was the municipality of New London, Connecticut. On June 23, 2005, the latest judgment of the US Supreme Court on this case attracted wide attention. This case involved a “paid collection” of land. According to the latest judgment of the US Supreme Court, local municipalities have the power to impose private land for commercial development – as long as such development falls within the category of “public use”. The Supreme Court ruled that “the city’s planned deployment of land acquisition is in line with 'public use' and within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment clause.” Therefore, the case also triggered a new round of discussions on how to implement the Fifth Amendment, how to explain it, and how to use it.
Answer:
B) Separation of church and state prohibits any interaction between religion and government.
Explanation:
