Helpppp nowwww plsss!!

The main aim of the argument presented is to talk down the use of burning by incinerators method to dispose chemical waste. The argument presents great points in that there were 40 incidents at two existing commissioned incinerators in the last year where unexpected releases of dangerous chemical agents happened.

So, basically, the argument is all about how the high frequency of the unsuspected release of dangerous chemical agents should discourage this method of chemical waste disposal.

The argument then concluded that if more chemical waste are disposed using the burning by incinerator method, there will be more unsuspected release of dangerous chemicals.

We are then required to find the statement that most weakens the conclusion that there will be more toxic releases if more chemical waste are burned.

Analysing the Statements one by one

Statement A

This statement provides a possible reason for this high frequency of dangerous chemical releases. It states that the staff haven't been properly trained. So, this means that properly training the staff should most likely lead to lesser cases of toxic releases into the environment.

This is the statement that most weakens the conclusion.

Statement B

The conclusion wasn't about the incinerator method being the safest method. It was about whether increased incineration would lead to more toxic relaeses. So, this doesn't affect the conclusion.

Statement C

This statement says that incineration can be increased without building new incinerators by tapping into unused capacity at the old incinerators. Also doesn't affect rhe conclusion whether increased use of incineration will lead to more toxic leaks.

Statement D

This statement strengthens the argument; which is the opposite of what we're aiming to achieve.

Statement E

This statement hints that the toxic leaks do not have that much of a harmful effect because the toxic releases do not go beyond the property of the incinerator. This also doesnt tackle the conclusion about the frequency of leaks, it only addresses how not harmful the toxic leaks can be.

Hope this Helps!!!

5 0

3 years ago

What is the number of molecules in<br> 500m cube of Oxygen at room temperature

d1i1m1o1n [39]

4.95 is the number of molecules in 500m cube of Oxygen at room temperature and pressure

we have got data

pressure=1atm

temperature=298 k

volume=500 m^3

gas constant, R=8.31

now, by applying ideal gas equation

PV=nRT

1×500=n×8.31×298

n=2476.38/500

n=4.95

It is the lowest part of the material and has chemical elemental properties. Atoms do not independently exist; rather, they combine to form ions and molecules, which then combine to form the material that we can see, feel, and touch.

Molecules are made up of one or more atoms connected by covalent (chemical) connections. Atoms can be visualized as circles with a nucleus in the center (made up of protons and neutrons) and one or more concentric circles around it that indicate the "shells" or "levels" in which the electrons surrounding the atom's nucleus are located, as well as markings that identify the electron. each level

To know more about molecules visit : brainly.com/question/11405437

#SPJ9

5 0

8 months ago

Estimate the ligand fi eld splitting for (a) [CrCl6]3 (max 740 nm), (b) [Cr(NH3)6]3 (max 460 nm), and (c) [Cr(OH2)6]3 (max 575 n

igor_vitrenko [27]

Answer:

NH3>H2O>Cl-

Explanation:

The given wavelengths of maximum absorption for each complex can be used to estimate the magnitude of field splitting of the respective ligands as shown in the image attached. The field splitting is reported in the unit kilojoule per mole (KJmol-1).

It can be seen from the calculation in the image attached that ammonia shows the highest crystal field splitting followed by water and lastly the chloride anion. This corresponds to the respective positions of these species in the spectrochemical series. Water and the chloride ion are weak field ligands.

4 0

3 years ago