The inverse of the statement is M be the point on PQ since PM is congruent to QM than M is midpoint on the PQ.
<h3>What do you mean by inverse?</h3>
Inverse of the statement means that explain the condition in reverse way or vice versa.
Since, M is the midpoint of PQ, then PM is congruent to QM.
Proving in reverse way, let m be the point between P and Q the distance M from P is equal to the distance from M to Q. Which implies that M lies as the mid of the P and Q.
Thus, the inverse of the statement is M be the point on PQ since PM is congruent to QM than M is midpoint on the PQ.
Learn more about inverse here:
brainly.com/question/5338106
#SPJ1
Answer:
140.
Step-by-step explanation:
Yes. If we wanted to get even more specific, -2 is an integer, which falls under the label of the real numbers. √-2, on the other hand, is an imaginary number. The square root of -1 doesn't exist in the real numbers, so we invent a new number i with the property that i² = -1. Blending real and imaginary numbers together creates <em>complex numbers, </em>numbers with a real and imaginary part. This extension of the number system is tremendously useful because it essentially makes numbers two-dimensional, allowing us to manipulate and study them through a geometric lens.
Answer:
False
Step-by-step explanation:
A reflection does not change the shape of a figure.
For example, If you look into a mirror, you are looking at a reflection of yourself, but your face doesn't change into something else...! :)
Is this more then one question?
