Rolle's Theorem does not apply to the function because there are points on the interval (a,b) where f is not differentiable.
Given the function is 
and the Rolle's Theorem does not apply to the function.
Rolle's theorem is used to determine if a function is continuous and also differentiable.
The condition for Rolle's theorem to be true as:
- f(a)=f(b)
- f(x) must be continuous in [a,b].
- f(x) must be differentiable in (a,b).
To apply the Rolle’s Theorem we need to have function that is differentiable on the given open interval.
If we look closely at the given function we can see that the first derivative of the given function is:
![\begin{aligned}f(x)&=\sqrt{(2-x^{\frac{2}{3}})^3}\\ f(x)&=(2-x^{\frac{2}{3}})^{\frac{3}{2}}\\ f'(x)&=\frac{3}{2}(2-x^{\frac{2}{3}})^{\frac{1}{2}}\cdot \frac{2}{3}\cdot (-x)^{\frac{1}{3}}\\ f'(x)&=\frac{-\sqrt{2-x^{\frac{2}{3}}}}{\sqrt[3]{x}}\end](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Baligned%7Df%28x%29%26%3D%5Csqrt%7B%282-x%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7D%7D%29%5E3%7D%5C%5C%20f%28x%29%26%3D%282-x%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7D%7D%29%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B2%7D%7D%5C%5C%20f%27%28x%29%26%3D%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B2%7D%282-x%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7D%7D%29%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7D%5Ccdot%20%28-x%29%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B3%7D%7D%5C%5C%20f%27%28x%29%26%3D%5Cfrac%7B-%5Csqrt%7B2-x%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7D%7D%7D%7D%7B%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7Bx%7D%7D%5Cend)
From this point of view we can see that the given function is not defined for x=0.
Hence, all the assumptions are not satisfied we can reach a conclusion that we cannot apply the Rolle's Theorem.
Learn more about Rolle's Theorem from here brainly.com/question/12279222
#SPJ4
The answer is very simple .
First you need to determine the slope, which is the reciprocal of the first line.
Then,
y = mx + b
m => -1/m
The perperdicular line has a new slope equal to m = -1/2
In the formula (y - y1) = m ( x - x1 ) + b , you should sustitude this value.
So the final equation will be
-3 = -1/2 (0) + b
b = - 3
y = (-1/2)x - 3
That is the solution
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
Because the number of degrees in a triangle is 180 degrees so x = 180 - (45 + 60) = 75. Now w + 75 = 180 , therfore w = 105 degrees.
It would be 82.54 centimeters tall by the end of August so you would round it up so it would become 83 centimeters meaning that the estimate would be greater than the actual height because you would be rounding up to the nearest whole number not down.
Answer:
B 21.2
Step-by-step explanation:
Im not sure at all tho. But I hope this helps :/
