It would just be 8 since an integer just means whole number.
The correct pair is option E, which is:
FH ≅ FH - reflexive property
ΔGFH ≅ ΔEFH - SAS theorem
<h3>What is the SAS Congruence Theorem?</h3>
The SAS theorems states that two triangles are congruent if they have two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent included angles.
<h3>What is the Reflexive Property?</h3>
The reflexive property of geometry states that an angle or line will always be congruent to itself.
In the two column-proof, since FH = FH using the reflexive property, then both triangles are congruent to each other by the SAS congruence theorem.
The missing pair of reasons that completes the proof are:
FH ≅ FH - reflexive property
ΔGFH ≅ ΔEFH - SAS theorem
Learn more about the SAS theorem on:
brainly.com/question/2102943
#SPJ1
Answer:
-2/4, 8/40, 21/30, 9, 9 20/25
Step-by-step explanation:
9/20/25 is a bit greater than 9.
21/30 is 9 away from a whole 8/40 is 32 away from 40 -2/4 is way less because its on the negative side which is like so far away from the other numbers.
The answer is 134 ft^2
the area of the smaller rectangle:

the area of the other rectangle:

the area of the whole shape:

good luck