a. The individual
c. His or her culture and history
d. His or her environment
In situations of death and grief there is no single way to deal with it, it will depend on several individual aspects, as well as environmental and cultural ones. But in general, death is always faced in a difficult way by human beings, as it is interpreted as the end of a cycle of a life of someone you loved.
Explanation:
Lex talionis means treating the criminals in the way the criminals treated the victims. In means giving the same sufferings to others as others have caused them suffering.
This principle is not plausible because according to Nathanson, it will make us to act in an immoral way with others. We cannot hijack the hijacker's plane because they did to us. We cannot spy on others because others are spying on us. Nathanson objected the principle because he believes that it is not possible to measure sufferings of others as different people suffered differently. So we cannot bring equal suffering.
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>C. Fundamental attribution errors. </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em><u>Fundamental attribution error,</u></em><em> in psychology, is determined as the proclivity of a person to 'overemphasize' or 'overestimate' a few personal or dispositional characters while ignoring situational or environmental factors in the process of judging someone else's behavior, for instance, if some misfortune happens with a person then he or she is being blamed by the other person for the same because the person feels his or her inappropriate behavior leads to that misfortune.</em>
<em><u>The correct answer for the question above is the fundamental attribution error. </u></em>
