The Incas had a centrally planned economy, perhaps the most successful ever seen. Its success was in the efficient management of labor and the administration of resources they collected as tribute. Economic exchanges were made using the barter system by which people traded with each other for things they needed.
The correct answer is individualism.
In the individualist society, everybody puts themselves and their own needs first, and then the others come second. Personal success is very important for such people, and the others aren't as relevant in their lives as in collectivist societies, for example.
<span>She was most clearly focused on satisfying the primary needs. The
theory of the pyramid of Maslow's needs indicates that the human being
focuses on solving a basic need before moving on to a more specific
need. <span>He places the primary needs in the lower part of the
pyramid, such as food or security, once this need is replaced, a more
complex need is introduced, such as the acquisition of knowledge.
I hope my answer can help you.
</span></span>
Answer: The first is with the consent of its parent country, that is when the government of the sovereign state which it belongs to allows it to secede, either through agreement between the central government.
Answer:
A correlation is only a mathematical means of describing the relationship between variables. When it is a positive correlation, it means when the value of one increases, for example, the value of the other variable also increases or when one decreases, so does the other. A negative correlation would show that as one variable increases in value, the other decreases. These relationships are non-causal as you're not manipulating variables to control them to see what is causing this relationship. Sometimes, non-causal covariance (or variables that don't have an effect on each other vary cooincidentally in a pattern-like fashion, when there is actually another variable causing the relationship going on.
Explanation:
In the case of this example, it is doubtful that having money causes you to have a higher grade point average. So while we see an increase in grade point average with those who have high income it could be due to other factors, like people with more money have access to learning tools, tutors and other things that people with less money don't have access to. So it is access to tools, not money that is actually causing a difference. There are likely dozens if not hundreds of other potential confounded variables that could be causing this observation.
